Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 7:13:295.
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-295.

Axis-I comorbidity is linked to prospective instability of diagnoses within eating disorders

Gabriella F Milos  1 , Volker Baur, Sabina Muehlebach, Anja Spindler
Affiliations

Axis-I comorbidity is linked to prospective instability of diagnoses within eating disorders

Gabriella F Milos et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Eating disorders (ED) are classified into Anorexia Nervosa, Bulimia Nervosa, and eating disorder not otherwise specified. Prospectively, the diagnostic instability within ED is high, but it is not clear which factors may account for this instability. So far, there is no evidence of whether psychiatric comorbidity may play a role in ED diagnostic crossover. We sought to determine possible influences of comorbidities of axis I and II on diagnostic crossover within ED.

Methods: Longitudinal data of 192 female patients were collected. All patients had a diagnosis of a current ED at study entry (baseline, T0). Diagnoses were re-established both 12 months (T1) and 30 months (T2) after T0. Comorbid psychiatric diagnoses were grouped into axis I and axis II according to DSM-IV.

Results: Patients with instable ED diagnoses had lifetime axis-I comorbidity more frequently than patients with stable ED diagnoses (χ2 = 4.74, df = 1, p < 0.05). Post-hoc exploratory tests suggested that the effect was mainly driven by affective disorders like major depression. There was no difference for axis-II comorbidity between stable and instable diagnostic profiles.

Conclusions: Following previous reports of diagnostic crossover in ED, the present investigation points to an influence of a life-time psychiatric comorbidity, in particular of axis I, on follow-up diagnoses of ED. Comorbid affective disorders like major depression might facilitate a switching between clinical phenotypes. The understanding of mechanisms and causes of the symptoms fluctuation will be subject of future studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fairburn CG, Bohn K. Eating disorder NOS (EDNOS): an example of the troublesome “not otherwise specified” (NOS) category in DSM-IV. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(6):691–701. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.06.011. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fairburn CG, Cooper Z, Shafran R. Cognitive behaviour therapy for eating disorders: a “transdiagnostic” theory and treatment. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41(5):509–528. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00088-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn, text revision) (DSM-IV-TR) 4. Washington DC: APA; 2000.
    1. Hudson JI, Hiripi E, Pope HG Jr, Kessler RC. The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(3):348–358. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Treasure J, Claudino AM, Zucker N. Eating disorders. Lancet. 2010;375(9714):583–593. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61748-7. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms