Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;19(7):824-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

Interphase microtubules: chief casualties in the war on cancer?

Affiliations
Review

Interphase microtubules: chief casualties in the war on cancer?

Angela Ogden et al. Drug Discov Today. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs) profoundly affect interphase cells, such as by disrupting axonal transport, transcription, translation, mitochondrial permeability, immune cell function, directional migration and centrosome clustering. This finding is antithetical to the conventionally held notion that MTAs act on mitosis to trigger arrest-mediated apoptotic cell death. Furthermore, the paucity of mitotic cells in patient tumors and lack of correlation of MTA efficacy with tumor proliferation rate provide strong impetus to re-examine the mechanistic basis of action of MTAs, with an eye toward interphase activities. Whereas targeted antimitotics have unequivocally failed their promise across clinical studies, MTAs constitute a mainstay of chemotherapy. This paradox necessitates the conclusion that MTAs exert mitosis-independent effects, spurring a dramatic paradigm shift in our understanding of the mode of action of MTAs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diverse anticancer interphase activities of microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs)
(a) [s4]Centrosome clustering is antagonized by novel microtubule-binding agents like griseofulvin and noscapinoids, which could impact diverse cellular activities such as Golgi compaction and polarization along with cell polarization and directional migration. (b) MTAs are mitotoxic and induce voltage-dependent anion channel opening with release of Ca2+ and cytochrome c. (c) MTAs also disrupt delivery of mRNA along interphase microtubule tracks to polysomes and (d) induce mRNA release from polysomes. (e) MTAs improve MHC class I expression by cancer cells, which could render them more ‘perceptible’ to the immune system, along with increasing activation of (f) dendritic cells, (g) cytotoxic T lymphocytes and (h) macrophages, among other generally proinflammatory, antitumor leukocytes. (i) By impeding vesicular traffic to the cell front, MTAs can inhibit the delivery of vesicles containing actin- and focal-adhesion-regulating factors, and matrix-digesting proteases, which normally promote leading edge protrusion and stromal invasion, respectively. (j) Similarly, interphase microtubule tracks are required for timely endocytosis of focal adhesion components from the leading edge and recycling to the trailing edge to propel directional migration. (k) Finally, MTAs interfere with transcription factor transport by motors to the nucleus with (l) up- or down-regulation of tumor suppressor or oncogenes, respectively. Abbreviations: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel.
Figure 1
Figure 1. Diverse anticancer interphase activities of microtubule-targeting agents (MTAs)
(a) [s4]Centrosome clustering is antagonized by novel microtubule-binding agents like griseofulvin and noscapinoids, which could impact diverse cellular activities such as Golgi compaction and polarization along with cell polarization and directional migration. (b) MTAs are mitotoxic and induce voltage-dependent anion channel opening with release of Ca2+ and cytochrome c. (c) MTAs also disrupt delivery of mRNA along interphase microtubule tracks to polysomes and (d) induce mRNA release from polysomes. (e) MTAs improve MHC class I expression by cancer cells, which could render them more ‘perceptible’ to the immune system, along with increasing activation of (f) dendritic cells, (g) cytotoxic T lymphocytes and (h) macrophages, among other generally proinflammatory, antitumor leukocytes. (i) By impeding vesicular traffic to the cell front, MTAs can inhibit the delivery of vesicles containing actin- and focal-adhesion-regulating factors, and matrix-digesting proteases, which normally promote leading edge protrusion and stromal invasion, respectively. (j) Similarly, interphase microtubule tracks are required for timely endocytosis of focal adhesion components from the leading edge and recycling to the trailing edge to propel directional migration. (k) Finally, MTAs interfere with transcription factor transport by motors to the nucleus with (l) up- or down-regulation of tumor suppressor or oncogenes, respectively. Abbreviations: MHC, major histocompatibility complex; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Komlodi-Pasztor E, et al. Inhibitors targeting mitosis: tales of how great drugs against a promising target were brought down by a flawed rationale. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012;18:51–63. - PubMed
    1. Mitchison TJ. The proliferation rate paradox in antimitotic chemotherapy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2012;23:1–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Komlodi-Pasztor E, et al. Mitosis is not a key target of microtubule agents in patient tumors. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2011;8:244–250. - PubMed
    1. Goodell PP, et al. Comparison of methods for proliferative index analysis for grading pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012;137:576–582. - PubMed
    1. Andereef M. Cell proliferation and differentiation. In: Hong WK, editor. Holland Frei Cancer Medicine. People' Medical Publishing House; 2009. pp. 26–39.

Substances