Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;43(1):73-87.
doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0210-1.

Intimacy, monogamy, and condom problems drive unprotected sex among young men in serious relationships with other men: a mixed methods dyadic study

George J Greene  1 , Rebecca Andrews, Laura Kuper, Brian Mustanski
Affiliations

Intimacy, monogamy, and condom problems drive unprotected sex among young men in serious relationships with other men: a mixed methods dyadic study

George J Greene et al. Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

This mixed methods study aimed to examine partner and relationship characteristics associated with HIV risk among young men who have sex with men (YMSM). A sub-sample of YMSM (18-25 years) who were involved in serious relationships with other men were recruited from two on-going longitudinal studies, Project Q2 and Crew450 (N = 20 couples). The mean age of the dyadic sample was 22.5 years (SD = 5.33, range 18-46 years) and participants were racially and ethnically diverse, with the largest percentage of the sample identifying as African American (47.5 %), followed by Hispanic (20 %). Participants completed individual self-report measures using computer-assisted self-interview technology and engaged in couples-based interviews. Mixed methods analyses indicated three global reasons for unprotected sex among YMSM in serious relationships: (1) the desire to achieve emotional intimacy; (2) the perception of being in a monogamous relationship; and (3) the difficulties associated with accessing and/or using condoms. Couples' decision-making processes, including decisions made "in the heat of the moment," have implications for HIV prevention interventions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reasons for unprotected sex by relationship length.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Appleby PR, Miller LC, Rothspan S. The paradox of trust for male couples: When risking is a part of loving. Personal Relationships. 1999;6:81–93.
    1. Axinn WG, Pearce LD. Mixed method data collection strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
    1. Bauermeister JA, Carballo-Diéguez A, Ventuneac A, Dolezal C. Assessing motivations to engage in intentional condomless anal intercourse in HIV-risk contexts (“bareback sex”) among men who have sex with men. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2009;21:156–168. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Johnson DF, Secura GM, MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA. The effect of partner characteristics on HIV infection among African American men who have sex with men in the Young Men's Survey, Los Angeles, 1999–2000. AIDS Education and Prevention. 2003;15(Suppl. 1A):39–52. - PubMed
    1. Blais M. Vulnerability to HIV among regular male partners and the social coding of intimacy in modern societies. Culture Health & Sexuality. 2006;8:31–44. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms