Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search
- PMID: 24203471
- DOI: 10.3758/BF03200774
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search
Abstract
An important component of routine visual behavior is the ability to find one item in a visual world filled with other, distracting items. This ability to performvisual search has been the subject of a large body of research in the past 15 years. This paper reviews the visual search literature and presents a model of human search behavior. Built upon the work of Neisser, Treisman, Julesz, and others, the model distinguishes between a preattentive, massively parallel stage that processes information about basic visual features (color, motion, various depth cues, etc.) across large portions of the visual field and a subsequent limited-capacity stage that performs other, more complex operations (e.g., face recognition, reading, object identification) over a limited portion of the visual field. The spatial deployment of the limited-capacity process is under attentional control. The heart of the guided search model is the idea that attentional deployment of limited resources isguided by the output of the earlier parallel processes. Guided Search 2.0 (GS2) is a revision of the model in which virtually all aspects of the model have been made more explicit and/or revised in light of new data. The paper is organized into four parts: Part 1 presents the model and the details of its computer simulation. Part 2 reviews the visual search literature on preattentive processing of basic features and shows how the GS2 simulation reproduces those results. Part 3 reviews the literature on the attentional deployment of limited-capacity processes in conjunction and serial searches and shows how the simulation handles those conditions. Finally, Part 4 deals with shortcomings of the model and unresolved issues.
Similar articles
-
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2021. PMID: 33547630 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search.Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Feb;7(2):70-76. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(02)00024-4. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003. PMID: 12584025
-
Part-whole information is useful in visual search for size x size but not orientation x orientation conjunctions.Percept Psychophys. 1995 Aug;57(6):749-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03206791. Percept Psychophys. 1995. PMID: 7651800
-
Clear distinction between preattentive and attentive process in schizophrenia by visual search performance.Psychiatry Res. 2007 Jan 15;149(1-3):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.01.014. Epub 2006 Nov 21. Psychiatry Res. 2007. PMID: 17123633 Clinical Trial.
-
Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Oct;23(5):1300-1315. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0978-1. Psychon Bull Rev. 2016. PMID: 26635097 Review.
Cited by
-
When do I quit? The search termination problem in visual search.Nebr Symp Motiv. 2012;59:183-208. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4794-8_8. Nebr Symp Motiv. 2012. PMID: 23437634 Free PMC article.
-
The interplay of goal-driven and stimulus-driven influences on spatial orienting.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Aug;78(6):1642-54. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1121-8. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 27259486 Free PMC article.
-
Saliency changes appearance.PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028292. Epub 2011 Dec 5. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22162760 Free PMC article.
-
Integration and disruption effects of shape and texture in haptic search.PLoS One. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e70255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070255. Print 2013. PLoS One. 2013. PMID: 23894626 Free PMC article.
-
Adaptation improves performance on a visual search task.J Vis. 2013 Feb 6;13(2):6. doi: 10.1167/13.2.6. J Vis. 2013. PMID: 23390320 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous