Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct 30;8(10):e79147.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079147. eCollection 2013.

Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science

Affiliations

Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science

Lesley G Campbell et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Here we present the first empirical evidence to support the hypothesis that a gender-heterogeneous problem-solving team generally produced journal articles perceived to be higher quality by peers than a team comprised of highly-performing individuals of the same gender. Although women were historically underrepresented as principal investigators of working groups, their frequency as PIs at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis is now comparable to the national frequencies in biology and they are now equally qualified, in terms of their impact on the accumulation of ecological knowledge (as measured by the h-index). While women continue to be underrepresented as working group participants, peer-reviewed publications with gender-heterogeneous authorship teams received 34% more citations than publications produced by gender-uniform authorship teams. This suggests that peers citing these publications perceive publications that also happen to have gender-heterogeneous authorship teams as higher quality than publications with gender uniform authorship teams. Promoting diversity not only promotes representation and fairness but may lead to higher quality science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Temporal changes in A) the frequency of male and female principal investigators at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (men: white background, black dots; women: black background, white dots) and at US universities (men: white unpatterned; women:black unpatterned, data from NSF 1998, 2009) and B) their average (SE) h-index (men: grey circle; women: black square).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Differences in A) the frequency of female working group participants at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (black background, white dots) and in US universities (black, unpatterned, data from NSF 1998, 2009) over time and B) the average number of citations (SE) received by publications with or without female coauthors.

References

    1. Page SE ( 2008) The Difference – How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. PrincetonUSA: Princeton University Press. 424 p.
    1. Bowers CA, Pharmer JA, Salas E (2000) When member homogeneity is needed in work teams - A meta-analysis. Small Group Research 31: 305–327.
    1. Stewart GL (2006) A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management 32: 29–55.
    1. Webber SS, Donahue LM (2001) Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of Management 27: 141–162.
    1. Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups. Science 330: 686–688. - PubMed

Publication types