Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;34(1):53-62.
doi: 10.1111/opo.12096. Epub 2013 Nov 10.

Validating a new device for measuring tear evaporation rates

Affiliations

Validating a new device for measuring tear evaporation rates

Athira Rohit et al. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Corrigendum.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019 Mar;39(2):127. doi: 10.1111/opo.12602. Epub 2019 Jan 9. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2019. PMID: 30776847 No abstract available.

Abstract

Purpose: To calibrate and validate a commercially available dermatology instrument to measure tear evaporation rate of contact lens wearers.

Methods: A dermatology instrument was modified by attaching a swim goggle cup such that the cup sealed around the eye socket. Results for the unmodified instrument are dependent on probe area and enclosed volume. Calibration curves were established using a model eye, to account for individual variations in chamber volume and exposed area. Fifteen participants were recruited and the study included a contact lens wear and a no contact lens wear stage. Day and diurnal variation of the measurements were assessed by taking the measurement three times a day over 2 days. The coefficient of repeatability of the measurement was calculated and a linear mixed model assessed the influence of humidity, temperature, contact lens wear, day and diurnal variations on tear evaporation rate. The associations between variables were assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: Absolute evaporation rates with and without contact lens wear were calculated based on the new calibration. The measurements were most repeatable during the evening with no lens wear (COR = 49 g m⁻² h) and least repeatable during the evening with contact lens wear (COR = 93 g m⁻² h). Humidity (p = 0.007), and contact lens wear (p < 0.01), significantly affected the tear evaporation rate. However, temperature (p = 0.54) diurnal variation (p = 0.85) and different days (p = 0.65) had no significant effect after controlling for humidity.

Conclusion: Tear evaporation rates can be measured using a modified dermatology instrument. Measurements were higher and more variable with lens wear consistent with previous literature. Control of environmental conditions is important as a higher humidity results in a reduced evaporation rate.

Keywords: contact lens; lipid layer; tear evaporation; tear film; validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources