Text messaging among residents and faculty in a university general surgery residency program: prevalence, purpose, and patient care
- PMID: 24209663
- PMCID: PMC3824151
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.003
Text messaging among residents and faculty in a university general surgery residency program: prevalence, purpose, and patient care
Abstract
Background: There is little information about the use of text messaging (texting) devices among resident and faculty physicians for patient-related care (PRC).
Objective: To determine the prevalence, frequency, purpose, and concerns regarding texting among resident and attending surgeons and to identify factors associated with PRC texting.
Design: E-mail survey.
Setting: University medical center and its affiliated hospitals.
Participants: Surgery resident and attending staff.
Outcome measures: Prevalence, frequency, purpose, and concerns regarding patient-related care text messaging.
Results: Overall, 73 (65%) surveyed physicians responded, including 45 resident (66%) and 28 attending surgeons (62%). All respondents owned a texting device. Majority of surgery residents (88%) and attendings (71%) texted residents, whereas only 59% of residents and 65% of attendings texted other faculty. Most resident to resident text occurred at a frequency of 3-5 times/d (43%) compared with most attending to resident texts, which occurred 1-2 times/d (33%). Most resident to attending (25%) and attending to attending (30%) texts occurred 1-2 times/d. Among those that texted, PRC was the most frequently reported purpose for resident to resident (46%), resident to attending (64%), attending to resident (82%), and attending to other attending staff (60%) texting. Texting was the most preferred method to communicate about routine PRC (47% of residents vs 44% of attendings). Age (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95; p = 0.003), but not sex, specialty/clinical rotation, academic rank, or postgraduate year (PGY) level predicted PRC texting.
Conclusions: Most resident and attending staff surveyed utilize texting, mostly for PRC. Texting was preferred for communicating routine PRC information. Our data may facilitate the development of guidelines for the appropriate use of PRC texting.
Keywords: Interpersonal, and Communication Skills; Patient Care; Professionalism; communication; patient care; professionalism; text messaging.
Copyright © 2013 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures







Similar articles
-
Smartphones and Patient Care: Exploring the Use of Text-Based Messaging for Patient-Related Communication.Surg Innov. 2016 Jun;23(3):305-8. doi: 10.1177/1553350615624788. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Surg Innov. 2016. PMID: 26763616
-
Resident and Attending Perceptions of Resident Involvement: An Analysis of ACGME Reporting Guidelines.J Surg Educ. 2017 May-Jun;74(3):415-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.012. Epub 2016 Nov 3. J Surg Educ. 2017. PMID: 27816432
-
Using Texting for Clinical Communication in Surgery: A Survey of Academic Staff Surgeons.Surg Innov. 2018 Jun;25(3):274-279. doi: 10.1177/1553350618761980. Epub 2018 Mar 14. Surg Innov. 2018. PMID: 29537349
-
Do Attending Surgeons and Residents See Eye To Eye? An Evaluation of the Accreditation Council For Graduate Medical Education Milestones in General Surgery Residency.J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e54-e58. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 23. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 27561627 Review.
-
Characteristics of Independent Academic Medical Center Faculty.J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e48-e53. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Jun 16. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 27321985 Review.
Cited by
-
What does it mean to be youth-friendly? Results from qualitative interviews with health care providers and clinic staff serving youth and young adults living with HIV.Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Apr 24;9:65-75. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S158759. eCollection 2018. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018. PMID: 29731672 Free PMC article.
-
"Covering provider": an effort to streamline clinical communication chaos.JAMIA Open. 2024 Jul 5;7(3):ooae057. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae057. eCollection 2024 Oct. JAMIA Open. 2024. PMID: 38974405 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers to Adoption of a Secure Text Messaging System: a Qualitative Study of Practicing Clinicians.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Apr;38(5):1224-1231. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07912-8. Epub 2022 Nov 14. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36376637 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Secure Messaging Applications for a Health Care System: A Case Study.Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Jan;10(1):140-150. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678607. Epub 2019 Feb 27. Appl Clin Inform. 2019. PMID: 30812040 Free PMC article.
-
Patients, pictures, and privacy: managing clinical photographs in the smartphone era.Arthroplast Today. 2018 Nov 12;5(1):57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2018.10.001. eCollection 2019 Mar. Arthroplast Today. 2018. PMID: 31020023 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Brown J, Shipman B, Vetter R. SMS: The Short Message Service. Computer. 2007;40:106–110.
-
- Smith A. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Washington, D.C: Pew Research Center; 2011. Americans and text messaging; pp. 1–14.
-
- Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Hart T, Chesser A, et al. Content of text messaging immunization reminders: what low-income parents want to know. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:119–121. - PubMed
-
- Baptist AP, Thompson M, Grossman KS, et al. Social media, text messaging, and email-preferences of asthma patients between 12 and 40 years old. J Asthma. 2011;48:824–830. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources