An assessment of the current US radiation oncology workforce: methodology and global results of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 2012 Workforce Study
- PMID: 24210081
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.050
An assessment of the current US radiation oncology workforce: methodology and global results of the American Society for Radiation Oncology 2012 Workforce Study
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the characteristics, needs, and concerns of the current radiation oncology workforce, evaluate best practices and opportunities for improving quality and safety, and assess what we can predict about the future workforce.
Methods and materials: An online survey was distributed to 35,204 respondents from all segments of the radiation oncology workforce, including radiation oncologists, residents, medical dosimetrists, radiation therapists, medical physicists, nurse practitioners, nurses, physician assistants, and practice managers/administrators. The survey was disseminated by the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) together with specialty societies representing other workforce segments. An overview of the methods and global results is presented in this paper.
Results: A total of 6765 completed surveys were received, a response rate of 19%, and the final analysis included 5257 respondents. Three-quarters of the radiation oncologists, residents, and physicists who responded were male, in contrast to the other segments in which two-thirds or more were female. The majority of respondents (58%) indicated they were hospital-based, whereas 40% practiced in a free-standing/satellite clinic and 2% in another setting. Among the practices represented in the survey, 21.5% were academic, 25.2% were hospital, and 53.3% were private. A perceived oversupply of professionals relative to demand was reported by the physicist, dosimetrist, and radiation therapist segments. An undersupply was perceived by physician's assistants, nurse practitioners, and nurses. The supply of radiation oncologists and residents was considered balanced.
Conclusions: This survey was unique as it attempted to comprehensively assess the radiation oncology workforce by directly surveying each segment. The results suggest there is potential to improve the diversity of the workforce and optimize the supply of the workforce segments. The survey also provides a benchmark for future studies, as many changes in the healthcare field exert pressure on the workforce.
Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Comments: American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2012 Workforce Study: The Radiation Oncologists' and Residents' Perspectives: in regard to Pohar et al.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Mar 15;88(4):978. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.024. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014. PMID: 24606861 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A special report of current state of the medical physicist workforce - results of the 2012 ASTRO Comprehensive Workforce Study.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 May 8;16(3):5232. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5232. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26103483 Free PMC article. Review.
-
American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2012 Workforce Study: the radiation oncologists' and residents' perspectives.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Dec 1;87(5):1135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.08.038. Epub 2013 Oct 22. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013. PMID: 24161423
-
The radiation oncology workforce: a focus on medical dosimetry.Med Dosim. 2014 Summer;39(2):197-200. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.02.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12. Med Dosim. 2014. PMID: 24630911
-
Faculty of Radiation Oncology 2014 workforce census.J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015 Dec;59(6):717-27. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12320. Epub 2015 Oct 29. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26511456 Free PMC article.
-
The Radiation Oncology Job Market: The Economics and Policy of Workforce Regulation.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Nov 1;96(3):501-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.029. Epub 2016 Jun 8. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016. PMID: 27681745 Review.
Cited by
-
A scoping review of the nurse practitioner workforce in oncology.Cancer Med. 2016 Aug;5(8):1908-16. doi: 10.1002/cam4.769. Epub 2016 Jun 5. Cancer Med. 2016. PMID: 27264203 Free PMC article.
-
A hands-on introduction to medical physics and radiation therapy for middle school students.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Apr;20(4):148-153. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12569. Epub 2019 Mar 18. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019. PMID: 30884103 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation oncology nursing: Highlights of the first multi-disciplinary pan-Canadian workforce survey.Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 Jan 1;35(1):128-144. eCollection 2025 Winter. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025. PMID: 40874097 Free PMC article.
-
A special report of current state of the medical physicist workforce - results of the 2012 ASTRO Comprehensive Workforce Study.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 May 8;16(3):5232. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5232. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015. PMID: 26103483 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A national survey of the radiotherapy dosimetrist workforce in the UK.Br J Radiol. 2022 Oct 1;95(1139):20220459. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220459. Epub 2022 Sep 26. Br J Radiol. 2022. PMID: 36063424 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources