Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis
- PMID: 24211507
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.061
Clinical outcomes with bioabsorbable polymer- versus durable polymer-based drug-eluting and bare-metal stents: evidence from a comprehensive network meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to investigate the relative safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable polymer (BP)-based biolimus-eluting stents (BES) versus durable-polymer (DP)-drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) by means of a network meta-analysis.
Background: Studies have suggested that BP-BES might reduce the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) and late adverse outcomes compared with first-generation DES. However, the relative safety and efficacy of BP-BES versus newer-generation DES coated with more biocompatible DP have not been investigated in depth.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing BP-BES versus currently U.S.-approved DES or BMS were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Information on study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes was extracted.
Results: Data from 89 trials including 85,490 patients were analyzed. At 1-year follow-up, BP-BES were associated with lower rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI), MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) than BMS and lower rates of TVR than fast-release zotarolimus-eluting stents. The BP-BES had similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with other second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of 1-year ST than cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). The BP-BES were associated with improved late outcomes compared with BMS and paclitaxel-eluting stents, considering the latest follow-up data available, with nonsignificantly different outcomes compared with other DP-DES although higher rates of definite ST compared with CoCr-EES.
Conclusions: In this large-scale network meta-analysis, BP-BES were associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with BMS and first-generation DES and similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of definite ST than CoCr-EES.
Keywords: BES; BP; CI; CoCr-EES; DP; OR; PC-ZES; PES; PtCr-EES; RCT; SES; ST; TVR; bare-metal stent(s); bioabsorbable polymers; biolimus-eluting stent(s); cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent(s); credible interval; drug-eluting stent(s); durable polymers; meta-analysis; odds ratio; paclitaxel-eluting stent(s); phosphorylcholine-based zotarolimus-eluting stent(s); platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stent(s); randomized controlled trial; sirolimus-eluting stent(s); stent thrombosis; target vessel revascularizations.
Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Deconstructing stent polymers.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 4;63(4):308-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.016. Epub 2013 Nov 6. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24211501 No abstract available.
-
Interventional cardiology: biodegradable-polymer DES versus second-generation durable-polymer DES.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;11(1):6. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2013.184. Epub 2013 Nov 26. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24275687 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical