Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 May 11;3(2):2302-15.
doi: 10.3390/cancers3022302.

The Role of High Frequency Dynamic Threshold (HiDT) Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Measurements in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: A (Revisited) Hypothesis Paper

Affiliations

The Role of High Frequency Dynamic Threshold (HiDT) Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Measurements in Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: A (Revisited) Hypothesis Paper

Irene Grossmann et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Following curative treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC), 30% to 50% of patients will develop recurrent disease. For CRC there are several lines of evidence supporting the hypothesis that early detection of metachronous disease offers a second opportunity for cure. This paper revisits the potential role of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in follow-up. A comprehensive review of the literature (1978-2008) demonstrates that the initial promise of serum CEA as an effective surveillance tool has been tarnished through perpetuation of poorly designed studies. Specific limitations included: testing CEA as only an 'add-on' diagnostic tool; lack of standardization of threshold values; use of static thresholds; too low measurement frequency. Major changes in localizing imaging techniques and treatment of metastatic CRC further cause a decrease of clinical applicability of past trial outcomes. In 1982, Staab hypothesized that the optimal benefit of serum CEA as a surveillance tool is through high-frequency triage using a dynamic threshold (HiDT). Evidence supporting this hypothesis was found in the biochemical characteristics of serum CEA and retrospective studies showing the superior predictive value of a dynamic threshold. A multi-centred randomized phase III study optimizing the usage of HiDT against resectability of recurrent disease is commencing recruitment in the Netherlands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results from the phase II trial.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bruinvels D.J., Stiggelbout A.M., Kievit J., van Houwelingen H.C., Habbema D.F., van de Velde C.J.H. Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 1994;219:174–182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tjandra J.J., Chan M.K.Y. Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2007;50:1783–1799. - PubMed
    1. Jeffery G.M., Hickey B.E., Hider P. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2002;1:CD002200. - PubMed
    1. Renehan A.G., Egger M., Saunders M.P., O'Dwyer S.T. Impact on survival of intensive follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. BMJ. 2002;324:1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kievit J. Colorectal cancer follow-up: A reassessment of empirical evidence on effectiveness. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000;26:322–328. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources