Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Oct;82(6):668-73.
doi: 10.1007/BF00227309.

Inheritance of isozyme and RFLP markers in Brassica campestris and comparison with B. oleracea

Affiliations
Free article

Inheritance of isozyme and RFLP markers in Brassica campestris and comparison with B. oleracea

J M McGrath et al. Theor Appl Genet. 1991 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Using primarily cDNA restriction fragment length polymorphism markers (RFLPs) previously located to Brassica oleracea (cabbage, 2n=18) chromosomes, we initiated a comparative RFLP map in an F2 population of B. campestris (turnip x mock pak-choi, 2n=20). As with B. oleracea, the genome of B. campestris showed extensive gene duplication, and the majority of detected duplicated loci were unlinked. Only 6 of the 49 identified loci were represented as a single copy, and 3 of these 6 were clustered on a single linkage group showing a distorted segregation ratio. Comparison with B. Oleracea indicates this synteny is conserved between species. Two other linkage groups also appeared syntenic between B. oleracea and B. campestris. One single copy locus appears to have changed synteny between B. oleracea and B. campestris. These observations suggest that B. oleracea and B. campestris share a common ancestor, but that chromosome repatterning has occurred during or after speciation. Within B. campestris, 5 loci appeared duplicated in one parent or the other, and 2 of these were linked. Differentiation through subspecies-specific duplication or deletion events is suggested as one mechansim for the evolution of numerous morphotypes within each of these species.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anal Biochem. 1983 Jul 1;132(1):6-13 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Jun;87(11):4251-5 - PubMed
    1. J Mol Appl Genet. 1983;2(3):273-83 - PubMed
    1. Genetics. 1988 Feb;118(2):341-51 - PubMed
    1. Theor Appl Genet. 1990 Jul;80(1):57-64 - PubMed