Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov-Dec;11(6):543-9.
doi: 10.1370/afm.1554.

Relationship quality and patient-assessed quality of care in VA primary care clinics: development and validation of the work relationships scale

Erin P Finley  1 , Jacqueline A Pugh, Holly Jordan Lanham, Luci K Leykum, John Cornell, Poornachand Veerapaneni, Michael L Parchman
Affiliations

Relationship quality and patient-assessed quality of care in VA primary care clinics: development and validation of the work relationships scale

Erin P Finley et al. Ann Fam Med. 2013 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Efforts to better understand the impact of clinic member relationships on care quality in primary care clinics have been limited by the absence of a validated instrument to assess these relationships. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a scale assessing relationships within primary care clinics.

Methods: The Work Relationships Scale (WRS) was developed and administered as part of a survey of learning and relationships among 17 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care clinics. A Rasch partial-credit model and principal components analysis were used to evaluate item performance, select the final items for inclusion, and establish unidimensionality for the WRS. The WRS was then validated against semistructured clinic member interviews and VA Survey of Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP) data.

Results: Four hundred fifty-seven clinicians and staff completed the clinic survey, and 247 participated in semistructured interviews. WRS scores were significantly associated with clinic-level reporting for 2 SHEP variables: overall rating of personal doctor/nurse (r(2) =0.43, P <.01) and overall rating of health care (r(2)= 0.25, P <.05). Interview data describing relationship characteristics were consistent with variability in WRS scores across low-scoring and high-scoring clinics.

Conclusions: The WRS shows promising validity as a measure assessing the quality of relationships in primary care settings; moreover, primary care clinics with lower WRS scores received poorer patient quality ratings for both individual clinicians and overall health care. Relationships play an important role in shaping care delivery and should be assessed as part of efforts to improve patient care within primary care settings.

Keywords: Veteran’s Administration; patient satisfaction; primary care; quality of care; relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Person-item map for 15-item Work Relationships Scale.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bodenheimer T. Primary care—will it survive? N Engl J Med. 2006; 355(9):861–864 - PubMed
    1. Østbye T, Yarnall KSH, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):209–214 - PMC - PubMed
    1. O’Toole TP, Pirraglia PA, Dosa D, et al. Primary Care-Special Populations Treatment Team Building care systems to improve access for high-risk and vulnerable veteran populations. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(Suppl 2):683–688 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Stewart EE, et al. Effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the National Demonstration Project model of the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1): S33–S44 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tresolini CP. Health Professions Education and Relationship-centered Care. San Francisco, CA: Pew-Fetzer Task Force; 1994

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources