Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Jan;42(1):169-78.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829a721f.

Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Advanced airway management simulation training in medical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cassie C Kennedy et al. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on teaching airway management using technology-enhanced simulation.

Data sources: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, Web of Science, and Scopus for eligible articles through May 11, 2011.

Study selection: Observational or controlled trials instructing medical professionals in direct or fiberoptic intubation, surgical airway, and/or supraglottic airway using technology-enhanced simulation were included. Two reviewers determined eligibility.

Data extraction: Study quality, instructional design, and outcome data were abstracted independently and in duplicate.

Data synthesis: Of 10,904 articles screened, 76 studies were included (n = 5,226 participants). We used random effects meta-analysis to pool results. In comparison with no intervention, simulation training was associated with improved outcomes for knowledge (standardized mean difference, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.19-1.35]; n = 7 studies) and skill (1.01 [0.68-1.34]; n = 28) but not for behavior (0.52 [-0.30 to 1.34]; n = 4) or patient outcomes (-0.12 [-0.41 to 0.16]; n = 4). In comparison with nonsimulation interventions, simulation training was associated with increased learner satisfaction (0.54 [0.37-0.71]; n = 2), improved skills (0.64 [0.12-1.16]; n = 5), and patient outcomes (0.86 [0.12-1.59]; n = 3) but not knowledge (0.29 [-0.28 to 0.86]; n = 4). We found few comparative effectiveness studies exploring how to optimize the use of simulation-based training, and these revealed inconsistent results. For example, animal models were found superior to manikins in one study (p = 0.004) using outcome of task speed but inferior in another study in terms of skill ratings (p = 0.02). Five studies comparing simulators of high versus low technical sophistication found no significant difference in skill outcomes (p > 0.31). Limitations of this review include heterogeneity (I2 > 50% for most analysis) and variation in quality among primary studies.

Conclusions: Simulation-based airway management curriculum is superior to no intervention and nonsimulation intervention for important education outcomes. Further research is required to fine-tune optimal curricular design.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Simulation and its role in airway management training.
    Mileder LP, Schmölzer GM. Mileder LP, et al. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):e541-2. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000282. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24933072 No abstract available.
  • The authors reply.
    Kennedy CC, Warner DO, Cook DA. Kennedy CC, et al. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jul;42(7):e542. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000425. Crit Care Med. 2014. PMID: 24933073 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources