Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013:2013:371951.
doi: 10.1155/2013/371951. Epub 2013 Oct 7.

A comparison between tube surgery, ND:YAG laser and diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the management of refractory glaucoma

Affiliations

A comparison between tube surgery, ND:YAG laser and diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the management of refractory glaucoma

Philip A Bloom et al. Biomed Res Int. 2013.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the results of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction by 3 treatment modalities, (a) glaucoma tube implants, (b) noncontact YAG laser cyclophotocoagulation (cycloYAG), and (c) contact transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation (cyclodiode), in cases of advanced glaucoma refractory to alternative treatments.

Methods: A consecutive group of 45 eyes that received cycloYAG were matched against two control groups of patients who had received tube surgery or cyclodiode, each control group having been derived from a database of patients.

Results: Mean pretreatment IOP improved from 41.3, 38.6, and 32.0 mmHg for the tube, cycloYAG, and cyclodiode groups, respectively, to 16.4, 22.1, and 19.3 mmHg, respectively. Treatment success was achieved in 78%, 69%, and 71% of the tube, cycloYAG, and cyclodiode groups, respectively. Visual acuity deteriorated 2 or more Snellen lines in 16%, 7%, and 9% of the patients in the tube, cycloYAG, and cyclodiode groups, respectively. Complications included retinal detachment, hypotony, and phthisis.

Conclusions: All 3 methods provided acceptable IOP lowering in the short and medium term. Control of IOP was best in patients receiving tube surgery. Cyclodiode and cycloYAG treatments were similarly effective in lowering IOP. Tube surgery was associated with a greater incidence of sight threatening complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in IOP (mmHg) following cycloYAG treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Change in IOP (mmHg) following cyclodiode treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in IOP following tube surgery.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean IOP control in the first year following treatment for all groups.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Change in Snellen visual acuity following treatment for Tube group.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Change in Snellen visual acuity following treatment for cycloYAG group.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Change in Snellen visual acuity following treatment for cyclodiode group.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Kaplan-Meier curves showing IOP control following treatment for all groups.

References

    1. Brown RD, Cairns JE. Experience with the Molteno long tube implant. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Societies of the United Kingdom. 1983;103(3):297–312. - PubMed
    1. Molteno AC. The use of draining implants in resistant cases of glaucoma. Late results of 110 operations. Transactions of the Ophthalmological Society of New Zealand. 1983;35:94–97. - PubMed
    1. Hitchings RA, Joseph NH, Sherwood MB, Lattimer J, Miller M. Use of one-piece valved tube and variable surface area explant for glaucoma drainage surgery. Ophthalmology. 1987;94(9):1079–1084. - PubMed
    1. Minckler DS, Heuer DK, Hasty B, Baerveldt G, Cutting RC, Barlow WE. Clinical experience with the single-plate Molteno implant in complicated glaucomas. Ophthalmology. 1988;95(9):1181–1188. - PubMed
    1. Traverso CE, Tomey KF, Al-Kaff A. The long-tube single plate Molteno implant for the treatment of recalcitrant glaucoma. International Ophthalmology. 1989;13(1-2):159–162. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources