Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 12;3(11):e003630.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003630.

Long-term prediction of major coronary or ischaemic stroke event in a low-incidence Southern European population: model development and evaluation of clinical utility

Affiliations

Long-term prediction of major coronary or ischaemic stroke event in a low-incidence Southern European population: model development and evaluation of clinical utility

Giovanni Veronesi et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To develop a long-term prediction model of first major cardiovascular event and to assess its clinical utility in a low-incidence European population.

Setting: Four independent population-based cohorts enrolled between 1986 and 1993 in Northern Italy.

Participants and methods: N=5247 35-year-old to 69-year-old men and women free of cardiovascular disease at baseline. Absolute 20-year risk of first fatal or non-fatal coronary or ischaemic stroke event (monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease (MONICA) validated) was estimated from gender-specific Cox models.

Main outcome measures: Model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-curve, AUC). 'High-risk' subjects were identified based on several threshold values for the 20-year predicted risk. Clinical utility was defined in terms of fraction of missed events (events among those considered at low-risk) and unnecessary treatment (false:true positive ratio). A net benefit curve was also provided.

Results: Kaplan-Meier 20-year risk was 16.1% in men (315 events) and 6.1% in women (123 events). Model discrimination (AUC=0.737 in men, 0.801 in women) did not change significantly as compared to 10-year prediction time interval. In men, with respect to risk stratification based on the number of risk factors, a 20% predicted risk cut-off would miss less events (36% vs 50%) and reduce unnecessary treatment (false:true positive ratio 2.2 vs 3.0); the net benefit was higher over the whole range of threshold values. Similar considerations hold for women.

Conclusions: Long-term prediction has good discrimination ability and is clinically useful for risk stratification in primary prevention. A clinical utility analysis is recommended to identify the optimal stratification according to different public health goals.

Keywords: Preventive Medicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision curve for the 20-year risk prediction model in the CAMUNI population, Northern Italy. Men (left) and women (right), 35–69 years, free of cardiovascular disease at baseline. Net benefit =(true positives−w×false positives)/n, where w=(absolute risk threshold)/(1−(absolute risk threshold)); n=sample size. Number of risk factors: total cholesterol>240 mg/dL; high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol <40 (men) or <50 (women) mg/dL; systolic blood pressure >160 mm Hg; smoking; diabetes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). Eur Heart J 2012;33:1635–701 - PubMed
    1. Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, et al. AHA guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: 2002 update: consensus panel guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. Circulation 2002;106:388–91 - PubMed
    1. D'Agostino RB, Ramachandran SV, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008;117:743–53 - PubMed
    1. Chambless LE, Folsom AR, Sharrett AR, et al. Coronary heart disease risk prediction in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:880–90 - PubMed
    1. Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J 2003;24:987–1003 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources