Electrical stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: an evidence-based analysis
- PMID: 24228081
- PMCID: PMC3817921
Electrical stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: an evidence-based analysis
Abstract
Objective: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in adults and children.
Data sources: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination database, for studies published from January 2007 until December 2012.
Review methods: Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and observational studies (in the absence of RCTs) of adults or children were included. DBS studies were included if they specified that the anterior nucleus of thalamus was the area of the brain stimulated. Outcomes of interest were seizure frequency, health resource utilization, and safety. A cost analysis was also performed.
Results: The search identified 6 studies that assessed changes in seizure frequency after electrical stimulation: 1 RCT on DBS in adults, 4 RCTs on VNS in adults, and 1 RCT on VNS in children. The studies of DBS and VNS in adults found significantly improved rates of seizure frequency, but the study of VNS in children did not find a significant difference in seizure frequency between the high and low stimulation groups. Significant reductions in hospitalizations and emergency department visits were found for adults and children who received VNS. No studies addressed the use of health resources for patients undergoing DBS. Five studies reported on adverse events, which ranged from serious to transient for both procedures in adults and were mostly transient in the 1 study of VNS in children.
Limitations: We found no evidence on DBS in children or on health care use related to DBS. The measurement of seizure frequency is self-reported and is therefore subject to bias and issues of compliance.
Conclusions: Based on evidence of low to moderate quality, both DBS and VNS seemed to reduce seizure frequency in adults. In children, VNS did not appear to be as effective at reducing seizure frequency, but children had significantly fewer hospitalizations and ED visits after VNS implantation. Despite the considerable risks associated with these invasive procedures, long-term adverse events appear to be limited.
Plain language summary: Electrical stimulation of specific areas of the brain is a procedure used to control epileptic seizures when more conventional treatments are not working. Most adults and children with epilepsy are able to control their seizures with medication, but for some patients, drugs are not effective and surgery to remove the part of the brain where the seizures start is not an appropriate option. This study looked at the research available on the effectiveness, safety, and cost of two types of electrical stimulation devices currently licensed for treatment of epilepsy for adults and children in Canada: vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Both approaches appear to be effective at reducing the frequency of seizures in adults. However, the evidence on DBS is limited to a single study with adults; we found no studies of DBS with children. Studies on VNS showed that both adults and children had fewer hospitalizations and emergency department visits after the procedure. Both procedures carry serious risks, but several longer-term studies have found that adverse events appear to be limited. The cost of VNS, including the process of assessing whether or not patients are good candidates for the procedure, is estimated to be about $40,000 per person (and higher for DBS because the device is more expensive and the operating time is longer). Of the 70,000 people in Ontario with epilepsy, about 1,400 (300 children and 1,110 adults) may be candidates for VNS to reduce their seizures.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Expected Budget Impact and Health Outcomes of Expanded Use of Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.Adv Ther. 2018 Oct;35(10):1686-1696. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0775-0. Epub 2018 Aug 24. Adv Ther. 2018. PMID: 30143957 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of utilization and cost of healthcare services and pharmacotherapy following implantation of vagus nerve stimulation vs. responsive neurostimulation or deep brain stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: analyses of a large United States healthcare claims database.J Med Econ. 2022 Jan-Dec;25(1):1218-1230. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2148680. J Med Econ. 2022. PMID: 36384429
-
Effect of vagus nerve stimulation on emergency department utilization in children with drug-resistant epilepsy: a retrospective cohort study.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024 Jun 21;34(3):260-267. doi: 10.3171/2024.4.PEDS23310. Print 2024 Sep 1. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2024. PMID: 38905712
-
A systematic review of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in childhood.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Mar 1;23(3):274-284. doi: 10.3171/2018.9.PEDS18417. Epub 2018 Nov 30. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 30544364
-
Neurostimulation in generalized epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Epilepsia. 2023 Apr;64(4):811-820. doi: 10.1111/epi.17524. Epub 2023 Feb 16. Epilepsia. 2023. PMID: 36727550
Cited by
-
Temperatures achieved in human and canine neocortex during intraoperative passive or active focal cooling.Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2015 Jun;5(2):95-103. doi: 10.1089/ther.2014.0025. Epub 2015 Apr 22. Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2015. PMID: 25902001 Free PMC article.
-
Neuromodulation in Drug Resistant Epilepsy.Aging Dis. 2021 Jul 1;12(4):1070-1080. doi: 10.14336/AD.2021.0211. eCollection 2021 Jul. Aging Dis. 2021. PMID: 34221550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurological results of the modified treatment of epilepsy by stimulation of the vagus nerve.Childs Nerv Syst. 2017 Nov;33(11):2017-2022. doi: 10.1007/s00381-017-3490-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017. PMID: 28689344 Clinical Trial.
-
Controlling mechanism of absence seizures by deep brain stimulus applied on subthalamic nucleus.Cogn Neurodyn. 2018 Feb;12(1):103-119. doi: 10.1007/s11571-017-9457-x. Epub 2017 Oct 20. Cogn Neurodyn. 2018. PMID: 29435091 Free PMC article.
-
A novel ex-vivo isolated rabbit heart preparation to explore the cardiac effects of cervical and cardiac vagus nerve stimulation.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 14;13(1):4214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31135-4. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36918673 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ontario Health Technology Advisory Committee. OHTAC recommendation: care for drug-refractory epilepsy in Ontario. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser [Internet]. 2012;12(17) Available from:http://www.hqontario.ca/en/documents/eds/2012/EpilepsyOHTACRec2012.pdf .
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Deep brain stimulation for refractory epilepsy [Internet]. London, UK: NHS. 2012. NICE interventional procedure guidance 416. Available from: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG416 .
-
- Medical Services Advisory Committee. Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy [Internet]. Canberra (AU): Commonwealth of Australia. 2008. p. 115. Available from:http://www.msac.gov.au/internet/msac/publishing.nsf/Content/115CC907F004... .
-
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schunemann HJ, Tugwell P, Knottnerus A. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epi. 2011;64(4):380–2. - PubMed
-
- Goodman C. Literature searching and evidence interpretation for assessing health care practices. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. 1996:81. SBU Report No. 119F. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical