Recurrent pilonidal sinus: lay open or flap closure, does it differ?
- PMID: 24229017
- PMCID: PMC3829057
- DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-13-00081.1
Recurrent pilonidal sinus: lay open or flap closure, does it differ?
Abstract
Treatment options of pilonidal sinus, which has high recurrence rates, is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to analyze for possible factors affecting recurrence. Forty-one patients with recurrent pilonidal sinus were included in this study. Of them, 33 were male and 9 were female (mean age, 24.9 years; age range, 16-42). Factors (i.e., risk factors) were detected in 32 patients. Excision-secondary healing and lay open was performed on 30 of the patients admitted with recurrence. Excision and flap closure was applied on 11 patients. Our recurrence rate was 9.7%. The recurrence rate of our study is compatible with the literature. Comparative studies are needed to determine the appropriate method to decrease recurrence rate.
References
-
- Spivak H, Brooks VL, Nussbaum M, Friedman I. Treatment of chronic pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39(10):1136–1139. - PubMed
-
- Søndenaa K, Nesvik I, Anderson E, Natas O, Soreide JA. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39–42. - PubMed
-
- Søndenaa K, Anderson E, Soreide JA. Morbidity and short-term results in a randomised controlled trial of open compared to closed treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus. Eur J Surg. 1992;158(6–7):351–355. - PubMed
-
- Doll D, Matevossian E, Wietelmann K, Evers T, Kriner M, Petersen S. Family history of pilonidal sinus predisposes to earlier onset of disease and a 50% long-term recurrence rate. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(9):1610–1615. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources