Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e80599.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080599. eCollection 2013.

Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Neuroendoscopic surgery versus external ventricular drainage alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis for intraventricular hemorrhage secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Yuping Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although neuroendoscopy (NE) has been applied to many cerebral diseases, the effect of NE for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of NE compared with external ventricular drainage (EVD) alone or with intraventricular fibrinolysis (IVF) on the management of IVH secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage.

Methodology/ principal findings: A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, OVID, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, CNKI, and Wan Fang database) was performed to identify related studies published from 1970 to 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies (OS) comparing NE with EVD alone or with IVF for the treatment of IVH were included. The quality of the included trials was assessed by Jaded scale and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). RevMan 5.1 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis.

Results: Eleven trials (5 RCTs and 6 ORs) involving 680 patients were included. The odds ratio (OR) showed a statistically significant difference between the NE + EVD and EVD + IVF groups in terms of mortality (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.59; P=0.0004), effective hematoma evacuation rate (OR, 25.50, 95%CI; 14.30, 45.45; P<0.00001), good functional outcome (GFO) (OR, 4.51; (95%CI, 2.81-7.72; P<0.00001), and the ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunt dependence rate (OR, 0.16; 95%CI; 0.06, 0.40; P<0.0001).

Conclusion: Applying neuroendoscopic approach with EVD may be a better management for IVH secondary to spontaneous supratentorial hemorrhage than NE + IVF. However, there is still no conclusive evidence regarding the preference of NE vs. EVD alone in the case of IVH, because insufficient data has been published thus far. This study suggests that the NE approach with EVD could become an alternative to EVD + IVF for IVH in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The PRISMA flow chart of the meta-analysis.
Figure 2
Figure 2. The mortality of IVH patients at the end of the follow-up.
(A) NE group versus EVD alone group, (B) NE + EVD group versus EVD +IVF group. (IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NE, neuroendoscopy; EVD, external ventricular drainage; IVF, intraventricular fibrinolysis).
Figure 3
Figure 3. The results of hematoma evacuation rate in IVH patients comparing NE + EVD group and EVD + IVF group.
(IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NE, neuroendoscopy; EVD, external ventricular drainage; IVF, intraventricular fibrinolysis.)
Figure 4
Figure 4. The result of good functional outcome (GFO) in IVH patients.
(A) NE group versus EVD alone group, (B) NE + EVD versus EVD + IVF group. (IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NE, neuroendoscopy; EVD, external ventricular drainage; IVF, intraventricular fibrinolysis).
Figure 5
Figure 5. The results of the dependent rate of ventriculo-peritoneal shunt surgery in IVH patients comparing NE + EVD group and EVD + IVF group.
(IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NE, neuroendoscopy; EVD, external ventricular drainage; IVF, intraventricular fibrinolysis).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Sensitivity analysis of two intervention comparison (NE versus EVD alone; NE + EVD versus EVD + IVF) on mortality.
Figure 7
Figure 7. Funnel plot of included studies.

References

    1. Rosen DS, Macdonald RL, Huo D, Goldenberg FD, Novakovic RL et al. (2007) Intraventricular hemorrhage from ruptured aneurysm: clinical characteristics, complications, and outcomes in a large, prospective, multicenter study population. J Neurosurg 107: 261-265. doi:10.3171/JNS-07/08/0261. PubMed: 17695378. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bhattathiri PS, Gregson B, Prasad KS, Mendelow AD, Investigators S (2006) Intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: results from the STICH trial. Acta Neurochir Suppl 96: 65-68 - PubMed
    1. Huttner HB, Köhrmann M, Berger C, Georgiadis D, Schwab S (2006) Influence of intraventricular hemorrhage and occlusive hydrocephalus on the long-term outcome of treated patients with basal ganglia hemorrhage: a case-control study. J Neurosurg 105: 412-417. doi:10.3171/jns.2006.105.3.412. PubMed: 16961136. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaberel T, Magheru C, Emery E (2012) Management of non-traumatic intraventricular hemorrhage. Neurosurg Rev 35: 485-494; discussion: 22732889. - PubMed
    1. Nishikawa T, Ueba T, Kajiwara M, Miyamatsu N, Yamashita K (2009) A priority treatment of the intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) should be performed in the patients suffering intracerebral hemorrhage with large IVH. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111: 450-453. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.01.005. PubMed: 19231066. - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources