Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Feb;29(1):2-16.
doi: 10.1007/s00455-013-9494-5.

Implementation of high-resolution manometry in the clinical practice of speech language pathology

Review

Implementation of high-resolution manometry in the clinical practice of speech language pathology

Molly A Knigge et al. Dysphagia. 2014 Feb.

Abstract

Visual imaging modalities, videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallow, for assessment of oropharyngeal dysphagia have been part of the speech language pathologist's (SLPs) armamentarium for the diagnosis and treatment of dysphagia for decades. Recently, the addition of high-resolution manometry (HRM) has enabled the SLP to evaluate pharyngeal pressures and upper esophageal sphincter relaxation. Taken together, the use of visual imaging modalities with HRM can improve interpretation of swallowing physiology and facilitate more effective treatment planning. The goal of this article is to describe a clinical paradigm using HRM as an adjunct to VFSS, by the SLP, in the assessment of complex dysphagia. Moreover, in three cases described, the value of manometric measurements in elucidating swallowing imaging studies and documenting physiologic change in response to treatment is highlighted. As technology in this area is evolving, so will the clinical use of HRM by the SLP. Limitations of current HRM systems and applications are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
HRM decision matrix
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Manometric catheter placement
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Normal swallowing spatiotemporal plot
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Spatiotemporal plots, Patient 1: 1 mL saline (a), 1 mL saline using head turn right with chin tuck (b), 5 mL with supraglottic swallow strategy (c), 5 mL with SGS and head turn right with chin tuck (d)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Spatiotemporal plots, Patient 2: 1 mL, baseline (a), 1 mL, 12 week post-therapy (b), 5 mL, 12-week post-therapy, with lean to left (c), 5 mL, 26 weeks detraining, with lean to left (d)
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Spatiotemporal plots, Patient 3: 1 mL baseline (a), 1 mL using head turn left with chin tuck baseline (b), 1 mL post-therapy and surgical intervention (c), 1 mL post-therapy and surgical intervention using head turn left with chin tuck (d)

References

    1. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, et al. A penetration–aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8. - PubMed
    1. Aviv JE. Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia. Laryngoscope. 2000;110:563–74. - PubMed
    1. Kelly AM, Drinnan MJ, Leslie P. Assessing penetration and aspiration: how do videofluoroscopy and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing compare? Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1723–7. - PubMed
    1. Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) using the penetration–aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17:308–15. - PubMed
    1. Kuhlemeier KV, Yates P, Palmer JB. Intra- and interrater variation in the evaluation of videofluorographic swallowing studies. Dysphagia. 1998;13:142–7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms