Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jun;49(3):838-57.
doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12127. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Efficiency of U.S. dialysis centers: an updated examination of facility characteristics that influence production of dialysis treatments

Sanatan Shreay  1 , Martin Ma, Jill McCluskey, Ron C Mittelhammer, Matthew Gitlin, J Mark Stephens
Affiliations

Efficiency of U.S. dialysis centers: an updated examination of facility characteristics that influence production of dialysis treatments

Sanatan Shreay et al. Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To explore the relative efficiency of dialysis facilities in the United States and identify factors that are associated with efficiency in the production of dialysis treatments.

Data sources/study setting: Medicare cost report data from 4,343 free-standing dialysis facilities in the United States that offered in-center hemodialysis in 2010.

Study design: A cross-sectional, facility-level retrospective database analysis, utilizing data envelopment analysis (DEA) to estimate facility efficiency.

Data collection/extraction methods: Treatment data and cost and labor inputs of dialysis treatments were obtained from 2010 Medicare Renal Cost Reports. Demographic data were obtained from the 2010 U.S. Census.

Principal findings: Only 26.6 percent of facilities were technically efficient. Neither the intensity of market competition nor the profit status of the facility had a significant effect on efficiency. Facilities that were members of large chains were less likely to be efficient. Cost and labor savings due to changes in drug protocols had little effect on overall dialysis center efficiency.

Conclusions: The majority of free-standing dialysis facilities in the United States were functioning in a technically inefficient manner. As payment systems increasingly employ capitation and bundling provisions, these institutions will need to evaluate their efficiency to remain competitive.

Keywords: Dialysis market; data envelopment analysis; efficiency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution (Frequency Percentages) on Raw Efficiency Scores of Baseline Data Envelopment Analysis Model
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution (Frequency Percentages) on Raw Efficiency Scores of the Baseline Data Envelopment Analysis Model and Simulation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Besarab A, Frinak S, Yee J. What Is So Bad about a Hemoglobin Level of 12 to 13 g/dL for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Anyway? Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 2009;16(2):131–42. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2008.12.007. - PubMed
    1. Bryce CL, Engberg JB, Wholey DR. Comparing the Agreement among Alternative Models in Evaluating HMO Efficiency. Health Services Research. 2000;35(2):509–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2010a. . “ ESRD Prospective Payment System Final Rule, Regulation Number CMS-1418-F ” [accessed on August 12, 2010]. Available at http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-18466.pdf.
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2010b. . “ Renal Cost Reports ” [accessed on March 5, 2012]. Available at http://cms.gov/CostReports/Downloads/RenalFY2010.zip.
    1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2011. . “ Dialysis Facility Compare ” [accessed on November 9, 2011]. Available at http://data.medicare.gov/dataset/Dialysis-Facility-Compare-Listing-by-Fa....

Publication types