Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 16:8:180.
doi: 10.1186/1750-1172-8-180.

Funding innovation for treatment for rare diseases: adopting a cost-based yardstick approach

Affiliations

Funding innovation for treatment for rare diseases: adopting a cost-based yardstick approach

Garret Kent Fellows et al. Orphanet J Rare Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Manufacturers justify the high prices for orphan drugs on the basis that the associated R&D costs must be spread over few patients. The proliferation of these drugs in the last three decades, combined with high prices commonly in excess of $100,000 per patient per year are placing a substantial strain on the budgets of drug plans in many countries. Do insurers spend a growing portion of their budgets on small patient populations, or leave vulnerable patients without coverage for valuable treatments? We suggest that a third option is present in the form of a cost-based regulatory mechanism.

Methods: This article explores the use of a cost-based price control mechanism for orphan drugs, adapted from the standard models applied in utilities regulation.

Results and conclusions: A rate-of-return style model, employing yardsticked cost allocations and a modified two-stage rate of return calculation could be effective in setting a new standard for orphan drugs pricing. This type of cost-based pricing would limit the costs faced by insurers while continuing to provide an efficient incentive for new drug development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proposed drug plan decision tree.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McCabe C, Claxton K, Tsuchiya A. Orphan drugs and the NHS: should we value rarity? Br Med J. 2005;331:1016–1018. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7523.1016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCabe C, Stafinski T, Menon D. Is it time to revisit orphan drug policies? Yes for equity’s sake. Br Med J. 2010;341:614. - PubMed
    1. Hirschler B. “Analysis: entering the age of the $1 million medicine”. Reuters; 2013. http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/03/us-rarediseases-idUSBRE9020C12....
    1. Carone G, Shwierz C, Xavier A. Cost-containment policies in public pharmaceutical spending in the EU. Econ Pap. 2012;461:1–64. September.
    1. Herper M. The World’s most expensive drugs. Forbes; 2010. February 22, accessed May 26 2013 http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/19/expensive-drugs-cost-business-healthcar....

Publication types