Incentivising reproducible research

Affiliations

¹ School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kate.button@bristol.ac.uk.
² MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

Review

Katherine S Button et al. Cortex. 2014 Feb.

. 2014 Feb:51:107-8.

doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.09.011. Epub 2013 Oct 10.

¹ School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom. Electronic address: kate.button@bristol.ac.uk.
² MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, and School of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.

No abstract available

References

1. Ashton JC. Experimental power comes from powerful theories: the real problem in null hypothesis testing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14(8):585. - PubMed
1. Bacchetti P. Small sample size is not the real problem. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013;14(8):585. - PubMed
1. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013a;14(5):365–376. - PubMed
1. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, Nosek BA, Flint J, Robinson ES, et al. Confidence and precision increase with high statistical power. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2013b;14(8):585. - PubMed
1. Cohen J. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1962;65:145–153. - PubMed