Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar;157(3):540-9.e1-2.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Nov 13.

A method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim area

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A method to estimate the amount of neuroretinal rim tissue in glaucoma: comparison with current methods for measuring rim area

Stuart K Gardiner et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: To test whether the minimum rim area assessed by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), based on the shortest distance from the Bruch membrane opening (BMO) to the inner limiting membrane, corresponds more closely to retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and visual field mean deviation (MD) than current rim measures in early glaucoma.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Methods: We studied 221 participants with non-endstage glaucoma or high-risk ocular hypertension and performed standard automated perimetry. We received SD-OCT and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (CSLO) scans on the same day. Rim area measured by CSLO was compared with 3 SD-OCT rim measures from radial B-scans: horizontal rim area between BMO and inner limiting membrane within the BMO plane; mean minimum rim width (BMO-MRW); and minimum rim area (BMO-MRA) optimized within sectors and then summed. Correlations between these measures and either MD from perimetry or RNFL thickness from SD-OCT were compared using the Steiger test.

Results: RNFL thickness was better correlated with BMO-MRA (r = 0.676) or BMO-MRW (r = 0.680) than with either CSLO rim area (r = 0.330, P < 0.001) or horizontal rim area (r = 0.482, P < 0.001). MD was better correlated with BMO-MRA (r = 0.534) or BMO-MRW (r = 0.546) than with either CSLO rim area (r = 0.321, P < 0.001) or horizontal rim area (0.403, P < 0.001). The correlation between MD and RNFL thickness was r = 0.646.

Conclusions: Minimum rim measurements from SD-OCT are significantly better correlated to both RNFL thickness and MD than rim measurements within the BMO plane or based on the clinical disc margin. They provide new structural parameters for both diagnostic and research purposes in glaucoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Definition and calculation of Bruch's Membrane Opening Horizontal Rim Area, as used to Estimate the Amount of Neuroretinal Rim Tissue in Glaucoma
(Top) Within each of the 24 radial scans, Bruch's Membrane Opening was delineated, shown by yellow arrows. (Second Panel) A plane was then fit to these 48 points, shown in red. Its intersection with the inner limiting membrane within each B-scan was marked (green circles). (Third Row, from left) Bruch's Membrane Opening (red) and Inner Limiting Membrane (green) intersection points were fit using B-splines and projected onto the plane. 48 radial interpolated horizontal rim widths (green lines) were interpolated from the Bruch's Membrane Opening centroid (red cross) at 7.5° intervals. For each 7.5° degree interval, the sectoral rim are a (purple) was calculated as the difference between areas of two circular sectors. (Bottom Row) Bruch's Membrane Opening Horizontal Rim Area was generated by summing these 48 sectoral areas.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Definition and calculation of Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width and Minimum Rim Area, as used to Estimate the Amount of Neuroretinal Rim Tissue in Glaucoma
(Top) Within each of the 24 radial scans, Bruch's Membrane Opening was delineated (red circles). The minimum rim width within that sector was defined as the shortest distance from this point to the Inner Limiting Membrane (yellow arrow, at angle θ above the Bruch's Membrane Opening plane). These were averaged across sectors to give the global measure Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Width. (Middle Panel) Within each sector, rim areas (yellow trapezoids) were calculated as the areas of trapezia at varying angles above Bruch's Membrane Opening plane. The height of each trapezium equals the rim width at this angle, referred to as RWθ. The base equals the circumference within that sector, 2πr/48, where r represents the distance from Bruch's Membrane Opening centroid (red cross). The top then has length 2πr / 48 × (r – RWθ * cos(θ)). (Bottom Panel) Within each sector the smallest such area was found, at angle φ, and its area calculated as (top+bottom)×RWφ/2. Note that RWφ will not always be the minimum rim width within this sector, as illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1. The global measure BMO-MRA is generated by summing the areas of these 48 trapeziums.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relations between Two Estimates of the Amount of Neuroretinal Rim Tissue in Glaucoma and Either Mean Deviation from Perimetry or Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness
Mean Deviation (in dB) and RNFL thickness (from an SD-OCT peripapillary circle scan, in μm) are plotted against the Rim Area (in mm2) as measured by Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (CSLO), or the Bruch's Membrane Opening Minimum Rim Area from spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) based on the minimum distance between inner limiting membrane and Bruch's Membrane Opening.

References

    1. Caprioli J. Correlation of visual function with optic nerve and nerve fiber layer structure in glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33(S):319–30. - PubMed
    1. Anton A, Yamagishi N, Zangwill L, Sample PA, Weinreb RN. Mapping structural to functional damage in glaucoma with standard automated perimetry and confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125(4):436–446. - PubMed
    1. Garway-Heath D, Holder G, Fitzke F, Hitchings R. Relationship between Electrophysiological, Psychophysical, and Anatomical Measurements in Glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(7):2213–2220. - PubMed
    1. Harwerth R, Carter-Dawson L, Smith E, Barnes G, Holt W, Crawford M. Neural Losses Correlated with Visual Losses in Clinical Perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(9):3152–3160. - PubMed
    1. Schlottmann P, De Cilla S, Greenfield D, Caprioli J, Garway-Heath D. Relationship between Visual Field Sensitivity and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness as Measured by Scanning Laser Polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45(6):1823–1829. - PubMed

Publication types