Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Apr;38(4):751-8.
doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2315-z.

Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments

Affiliations
Observational Study

Impact of intraoperative distractions on patient safety: a prospective descriptive study using validated instruments

Nick Sevdalis et al. World J Surg. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Background: There is emerging evidence indicating that distractions in the operating room (OR) are prevalent. Studies have shown a negative impact of distractions, but they have been conducted mostly with residents in simulated environments. We tested the hypothesis that intraoperative distractions are associated with deterioration in patient safety checks in the OR.

Methods: We assessed 24 elective urologic procedures. Blinded trained assessors (two surgeons, one psychologist) used validated instruments to prospectively assess in vivo frequency and severity of distractions (related to communication, phones/pagers, equipment/provisions, OR environment, other hospital departments, or a member of the OR team) and completion of safety-related tasks (related to the patient, equipment, and communication). Descriptive and correlational analyses were conducted.

Results: Mean case duration was 70 min (mean intraoperative time 31 min). A mean of 4.0 communication distractions (range 0-9) and 2.48 other distractions (range 0-5) were recorded per case (distraction rate of one per 10 min). Distractions from external visitors (addressed to the entire team or the surgeon) and distractions due to lack of coordination between hospital departments were most disruptive. Regarding safety checks, patient tasks were completed most often (85-100 %) followed by equipment tasks (75-100 %) and communication tasks (55-90 %). Correlational analyses showed that more frequent/severe communication distractions were linked to lower completion of patient checks intraoperatively (median rho -0.56, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Distractions are prevalent in ORs and in this study were linked to deterioration in intraoperative patient safety checks. Surgeons should be mindful of their tolerance to distractions. Surgical leadership can help control distractions and reduce their potential impact on patient safety and performance.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):318-30, 330.e1-6 - PubMed
    1. World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9 - PubMed
    1. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):135-9 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Feb;212(2):234-243.e1-5 - PubMed
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 May;88(3):249-51 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources