Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 7;8(11):e79737.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079737. eCollection 2013.

Prevalence of Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancers

Affiliations

Prevalence of Lynch syndrome among patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancers

Cecilia Egoavil et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary condition that increases the risk for endometrial and other cancers. The identification of endometrial cancer (EC) patients with LS has the potential to influence life-saving interventions. We aimed to study the prevalence of LS among EC patients in our population.

Methods: Universal screening for LS was applied for a consecutive series EC. Tumor testing using microsatellite instability (MSI), immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch-repair (MMR) protein expression and MLH1-methylation analysis, when required, was used to select LS-suspicious cases. Sequencing of corresponding MMR genes was performed.

Results: One hundred and seventy-three EC (average age, 63 years) were screened. Sixty-one patients (35%) had abnormal IHC or MSI results. After MLH1 methylation analysis, 27 cases were considered suspicious of LS. From these, 22 were contacted and referred for genetic counseling. Nineteen pursued genetic testing and eight were diagnosed of LS. Mutations were more frequent in younger patients (<50 yrs). Three cases had either intact IHC or MSS and reinforce the need of implement the EC screening with both techniques.

Conclusion: The prevalence of LS among EC patients was 4.6% (8/173); with a predictive frequency of 6.6% in the Spanish population. Universal screening of EC for LS is recommended.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Decision–support flow diagram for patients with Lynch syndrome: genetic diagnosis strategy.

References

    1. Folkins AK, Longacre TA (2013) Hereditary gynaecological malignancies: advances in screening and treatment. Histopathology 62: 2-30. doi:10.1111/his.12028. PubMed: 23240667. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49: 1374–1403. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027. PubMed: 23485231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gruber SB, Thompson WD (1996) A population-based study of endometrial cancer and familial risk in younger women. Cancer and Steroid Hormone Study Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 5: 411-417. - PubMed
    1. Peltomäki P (2003) Role of DNA mismatch repair defects in the pathogenesis of human cancer. J Clin Oncol 21: 1174-1179. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.04.060. PubMed: 12637487. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A (2003) Hereditary colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 348: 919–932. doi:10.1056/NEJMra012242. PubMed: 12621137. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources