Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;34(4):443-53.
doi: 10.1177/0272989X13511706. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher  1   2   3   4 , Holly O Witteman  3   5   6   7 , Mark Dickson  3   8 , Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis  3   9 , Valerie C Kahn  3 , Nicole L Exe  3 , Melissa Valerio  3   10 , Lisa G Holtzman  11 , Laura D Scherer  3   12   13 , Angela Fagerlin  2   3   13   14
Affiliations

Blocks, ovals, or people? Icon type affects risk perceptions and recall of pictographs

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher et al. Med Decis Making. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background: Research has demonstrated that icon arrays (also called "pictographs") are an effective method of communicating risk statistics and appear particularly useful to less numerate and less graphically literate people. Yet research is very limited regarding whether icon type affects how people interpret and remember these graphs.

Methods: 1502 people age 35-75 from a demographically diverse online panel completed a cardiovascular risk calculator based on Framingham data using their actual age, weight, and other health data. Participants received their risk estimate in an icon array graphic that used 1 of 6 types of icons: rectangular blocks, filled ovals, smile/frown faces, an outline of a person's head and shoulders, male/female "restroom" person icons (gender matched), or actual head-and-shoulder photographs of people of varied races (gender matched). In each icon array, blue icons represented cardiovascular events and gray icons represented those who would not experience an event. We measured perceived risk magnitude, approximate recall, and opinions about the icon arrays, as well as subjective numeracy and an abbreviated measure of graphical literacy.

Results: Risk recall was significantly higher with more anthropomorphic icons (restroom icons, head outlines, and photos) than with other icon types, and participants rated restroom icons as most preferred. However, while restroom icons resulted in the highest correlations between perceived and actual risk among more numerate/graphically literate participants, they performed no better than other icon types among less numerate/graphically literate participants.

Conclusions: Icon type influences both risk perceptions and risk recall, with restroom icons in particular resulting in improved outcomes. However, optimal icon types may depend on numeracy and/or graphical literacy skills.

Keywords: decision aids; patient education as topic; patient-provider communication; risk; visual aids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The 6 icon array displays
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hawley ST, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Ubel PA, Jankovic A, Lucas T, Fagerlin A. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73(3):448–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A. The effect of format on parents’ understanding of the risks and benefits of clinical research: A comparison between text, tables, and graphics. J Health Commun. 2010;15(5):487–501. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.492560. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Galesic M, Garcia-Retamero R, Gigerenzer G. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. Health Psychol. 2009 Mar;28(2):210–6. doi: 10.1037/a0014474. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Retamero R, Galesic M. Who profits from visual aids: Overcoming challenges in people’s understanding of risks. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70(7):1019–25. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fagerlin A, Wang C, Ubel PA. Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people’s health care decisions: Is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making. 2005;25(4):398–405. - PubMed

Publication types