Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014;58(2):734-9.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.01289-13. Epub 2013 Nov 18.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of linezolid versus daptomycin for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of linezolid versus daptomycin for treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia

Eleni P Balli et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014.

Abstract

Limited therapeutic options exist for the treatment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bacteremia; the most commonly used are daptomycin and linezolid. We attempted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative efficacy of those two agents. Studies comparing daptomycin to linezolid treatment for VRE bacteremia, published until August 2012, were identified from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ISI Web of Science, and SCOPUS databases. All comparative studies on patients older than 18 years of age that provided mortality data were considered eligible for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Τhe primary outcome of the meta-analysis was 30-day all-cause mortality. Ten retrospective studies including 967 patients were identified. Patients treated with daptomycin had significantly higher 30-day all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08 to 2.40) and infection-related mortality (OR, 3.61; 95% CI, 1.42 to 9.20) rates than patients treated with linezolid. When data from all 10 studies were combined, overall mortality was also significantly increased among patients treated with daptomycin (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.89). These findings were confirmed when odds ratios adjusted for potential confounders were pooled. Relapse rates among patients treated with daptomycin were also higher (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 0.94 to 6.72), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Adverse event rates were not significantly different between the two groups. Notwithstanding the absence of randomized prospective data, available evidence suggests that mortality rates may be higher with daptomycin than with linezolid among patients treated for VRE bacteremia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Forest plots (using Mantel-Haenszel [M-H] analysis) of unadjusted (a) and adjusted (b) odds ratios for 30-day all-cause mortality among patients treated with linezolid or daptomycin for VRE bacteremia. CI, confidence interval; SE, standard error; IV, Inverse variance.
FIG 2
FIG 2
Forest plots (using Mantel-Haenszel [M-H] analysis) of odds ratios for infection-related mortality (a) and in-hospital mortality (b) among patients treated with linezolid or daptomycin for VRE bacteremia.
FIG 3
FIG 3
Forest plots (using Mantel-Haenszel [M-H] analysis) of unadjusted (a) and adjusted (b) odds ratios for overall mortality among patients treated with linezolid or daptomycin for VRE bacteremia.
FIG 4
FIG 4
Forest plots (using Mantel-Haenszel [M-H] analysis) of odds ratios for microbiological cure (a) and bacteremia recurrence (b) in patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid for VRE bacteremia.

References

    1. Wisplinghoff H, Bischoff T, Tallent SM, Seifert H, Wenzel RP, Edmond MB. 2004. Nosocomial bloodstream infections in US hospitals: analysis of 24,179 cases from a prospective nationwide surveillance study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 39:309–317. 10.1086/421946 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hidron AI, Edwards JR, Patel J, Horan TC, Sievert DM, Pollock DA, Fridkin SK. 2008. NHSN annual update: antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: annual summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 29:996–1011. 10.1086/591861 - DOI - PubMed
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control 2010. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance in Europe 2009. Annual report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network (EARS-Net). ECDC, Stockholm, Sweden: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/1011_SUR_annual_EARS_...
    1. Han SH, Chin BS, Lee HS, Jeong SJ, Choi HK, Kim CO, Yong D, Choi JY, Song YG, Lee K, Kim JM. 2009. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci bacteremia: risk factors for mortality and influence of antimicrobial therapy on clinical outcome. J. Infect. 58:182–190. 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.01.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McKinnell JA, Patel M, Shirley RM, Kunz DF, Moser SA, Baddley JW. 2011. Observational study of the epidemiology and outcomes of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus bacteraemia treated with newer antimicrobial agents. Epidemiol. Infect. 139:1342–1350. 10.1017/S0950268810002475 - DOI - PMC - PubMed