Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Nov 19;159(10):660-6.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00004.

Comparative safety of vascular closure devices and manual closure among patients having percutaneous coronary intervention

Observational Study

Comparative safety of vascular closure devices and manual closure among patients having percutaneous coronary intervention

Hitinder S Gurm et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: The role of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in patients having percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is controversial, and recommendations for use vary.

Objective: To examine the use of and outcomes associated with VCDs in real-world practice.

Design: Observational cohort study.

Setting: 32 hospitals in Michigan that participate in a large multicenter quality improvement collaborative.

Patients: Consecutive patients having emergent and nonemergent PCI from 2007 to 2009.

Measurements: Vascular complications and the need for transfusion.

Results: Of the 85 048 PCIs performed during the study that met the inclusion criteria, 28 528 (37%) procedures used VCDs. In propensity score-matched analysis, VCDs were associated with reductions in vascular complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.90]; P = 0.001) and postprocedure transfusions (OR, 0.85 [CI, 0.74 to 0.96]; P = 0.011). These findings were consistent across many prespecified subgroups except for patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m2 and those treated with platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors, in whom the benefit of VCDs over manual closure was attenuated. When the specific subtypes of vascular complications were evaluated, VCDs were associated with fewer hematomas (OR, 0.69 [CI, 0.58 to 0.83]; P < 0.001) or pseudoaneurysms (OR, 0.54 [CI, 0.38 to 0.76]; P < 0.001) but an increase in the odds of retroperitoneal bleeding (OR, 1.57 [CI, 1.12 to 2.20]; P = 0.009).

Limitation: Unmeasured confounding cannot be excluded despite the study having measured and balanced many confounders.

Conclusion: Vascular closure devices were associated with a significant reduction in vascular complications and need for transfusion in this large cohort of patients having transfemoral PCI. This benefit was lost in patients receiving GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and those with normal or lean BMI and was counterbalanced by a small increase in the more serious risk for retroperitoneal bleeding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Comparative safety of vascular closure devices.
    Gurm HS, Hosman C, Hansen BB. Gurm HS, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):438. doi: 10.7326/L14-5006-2. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24723084 No abstract available.
  • In response.
    Gurm HS, Hosman C, Hansen BB. Gurm HS, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 18;160(6):438-9. doi: 10.7326/L14-5006-2. Ann Intern Med. 2014. PMID: 24772490 No abstract available.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources