Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987 Oct;6(5):337-40.
doi: 10.1007/BF00269554.

Factors affecting protoplast electrofusion efficiency

Affiliations

Factors affecting protoplast electrofusion efficiency

L J Nea et al. Plant Cell Rep. 1987 Oct.

Abstract

The electrofusion efficiency of protoplasts isolated from a carrot (Daucus carota) suspension culture was increased by treatment with 0.1 mg/ml lysolecithin, 2.5% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), or 0.5 mM Ca(2+). The lysolecithin and DMSO treatments substantially increased protoplast lysis, whereas calcium treatment did not. The enzymes used for protoplast isolation were also found to have a dramatic effect on the efficiency of fusion. A mixture of Cellulysin and Driselase led to a two-fold enhancement of fusion as compared with Driselase alone. The stimulation by Cellulysin appears to be due to enzymatic modification of the cell surface. However, comparison of the time course for wall digestion with the development of susceptibility to electrofusion suggests that the effect of Cellulysin is not simply due to removal of the cell wall. Brief treatment of the cells with pronase or proteinase K also doubled the efficiency of fusion. Taken together, these results indicate that electrofusion efficiency can be enhanced by the method used for protoplast isolation; they also suggest that modification of membrane/cell-surface proteins during protoplast isolation may be particularly important in determining electrofusion efficiencies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Planta. 1985 Aug;165(2):205-16 - PubMed
    1. Biosci Rep. 1984 Apr;4(4):335-42 - PubMed
    1. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1982 Nov 30;694(3):227-77 - PubMed
    1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981 Jul 16;101(1):165-71 - PubMed
    1. Plant Cell Rep. 1986 Oct;5(5):342-5 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources