Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 May;164(1):115-20.
doi: 10.1007/BF00391035.

A comparison of the kinetic properties of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from guard-cell and mesophyll-cell protoplasts of Commelina communis

Affiliations

A comparison of the kinetic properties of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase from guard-cell and mesophyll-cell protoplasts of Commelina communis

N Donovan et al. Planta. 1985 May.

Abstract

Some kinetic properties of partially purified phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPCase) from guard-cell and mesophyll-cell protoplasts of Commelina communis are described. The PEPCase activity inherent to each cell type was determined and the apparent K m (phosphoenolpyruvate) and K i (malate) were compared. Malate sensitivity was much higher (K i malate 0.4 mol m(-3)) in the extract of guard-cell protoplasts than in that of mesophyllcell protoplasts (K i malate 4.2 mol m(-3)). The stimulation of activity by glucose-6-phosphate in the presence of malate ('deinhibition') was also investigated in extracts from both cell types and was found to be similar to previously reported results with epidermal tissue. The effect of contamination of an extract of guard-cell protoplasts with mesophyll-cell protoplasts was measured in the presence and absence of malate. It was found that a small amount to mesophyll-cell contaminant appears to desensitize the malate inhibition of PEPCase from guard-cell protoplasts. It is concluded that experiments which use epidermal tissue to study guardcell PEPCase may give misleading information as a consequence of mesophyll contamination.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Planta. 1982 May;154(4):339-43 - PubMed
    1. Plant Physiol. 1979 Aug;64(2):269-72 - PubMed
    1. Planta. 1982 Nov;156(1):92-4 - PubMed
    1. Biochem J. 1974 Jun;139(3):721-30 - PubMed
    1. Planta. 1982 Sep;155(5):416-22 - PubMed