Pulmonary Complications due to Esophagectomy
- PMID: 24250962
- PMCID: PMC3825331
- DOI: 10.5681/jcvtr.2011.020
Pulmonary Complications due to Esophagectomy
Abstract
Introduction: Esophageal carcinoma is the scourge of human beings. Pulmonary complications in patients who have undergone operation are common (20-30% of cases) and there are no suitable tools and ways to predict these complications.
Methods: During a period of 10 years, from March 1998 to February 2007, 200 patients (150 male and 50 female) underwent Esophagectomy due to esophageal carcinoma in thoracic surgery ward retrospectively. Complications include the length of hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, morbidity and mortality. Patients' risk factors include age, preoperative chemo-radiotherapy, stage of the disease and preoperative spirometry condition.
Results: WE GROUPED OUR PATIENTS INTO THREE CATEGORIES: Normal (FEV1 ≥ 80% predicted), mildly impaired (FEV1 65% to 79% predicted), more severely impaired (FEV1 < 65% predicted).Although almost all patients had radiographic pulmonary abnormalities, significant pulmonary complications occurred in 40 patients (20%) which underwent Esophagectomy. Pleural effusion and atelectasia in 160 patients (80%). 24 patients needed chest-tube insertion. 20 patients (10%) developed ARDS. 14 patients (7%) developed chylothorax. 20 patients (10%) of patients died during their postoperative hospital stay. 30 patients (15%) required mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 hours.
Conclusion: We reviewed a number of preoperative clinical variables to determine whether they contributed to postoperative pulmonary complications as well as other outcomes. In general, age, impaired pulmonary function especially in those patients with FEV1 less than 65% predicted was associated with prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS). In fact pulmonary complications rate after Esophagectomy are high and there was associated mortality and morbidity.
Keywords: Esophagectomy; Pulmonary Complication; Pulmonary Resection.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interests: No conflict of interest to be declared.
References
-
- Oschner A, DeBakey M. Surgical aspects of carcinoma of the esophagus. J Thorac Surg. 1941;10:401–45.
-
- Jamieson GG, Mathew G. Surgical management of esophageal cancer: the Western experience. In: Daly JM, Hennessy TPJ, Reynolds JV, eds. Management of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer. London: WB Saunders; 1999:183-99.
-
- Hulscher JBF, Tijssen JGP, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJB. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:306–13. - PubMed
-
- Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: A review. Am J Surg. 1995;169:634–40. - PubMed
-
- Gandhi SK, Naunheim KS. Complications of transhiatal esophagectomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997;7:601–10. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical