The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME)
- PMID: 24251374
- PMCID: PMC4026343
- DOI: 10.1111/trf.12498
The impact of platelet additive solution apheresis platelets on allergic transfusion reactions and corrected count increment (CME)
Abstract
Background: Allergic transfusion reaction (ATR) incidence ranges from 1% to 3% of all transfusions. We evaluated the impact of InterSol platelet additive solution (PAS) apheresis platelets (APs) on the incidence of ATRs and the posttransfusion platelet (PLT) increment.
Study design and methods: This retrospective study evaluated all ATRs among patients at a university hospital that maintained a mixed inventory of PAS APs and non-PAS APs (standard plasma-suspended PLTs). Corrected count increments (CCIs) were calculated for AP transfusions of individuals who received both a PAS and a non-PAS AP transfusion within a 7-day period. Hypothesis testing was performed with chi-square test for dichotomous variables and t tests for continuous variables.
Results: The incidence of ATRs among the non-PAS APs was 1.85% (72 ATRs/3884 transfusions) and 1.01% (12 ATRs/1194 transfusions) for PAS APs (risk ratio [RR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.30-0.99; p=0.04). However, there was no difference in the incidence of febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions between non-PAS APs (incidence, 0.70%; 27/3884) compared to PAS APs (incidence, 0.59%; 7/1194; p=0.69). Among 223 individuals with paired non-PAS and PAS AP transfusions, the mean CCI at 1 to 4 hours after transfusion was 4932 (95% CI, 4452-5412) for non-PAS APs and was lower for PAS APs (CCI, 3766; 95% CI, 3375-4158; p ≤ 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in mean CCI at 12 to 24 hours between non-PAS (CCI, 2135; 95% CI, 1696-2573) and PAS APs (CCI, 1745; 95% CI, 1272-2217; p=0.14).
Conclusions: PAS APs substantially reduce the number of ATRs. CCIs for PAS APs were lower immediately after transfusion, but not significantly different at 12 to 24 hours.
© 2013 American Association of Blood Banks.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: Johns Hopkins University has previously received research support from Fenwal, Inc. Except for Richard Benjamin who is a consultant for Fenwal, all authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Domen RE, Hoeltge GA. Allergic transfusion reactions: an evaluation of 273 consecutive reactions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003;127:316–20. - PubMed
-
- Enright H, Davis K, Gernsheimer T, McCullough JJ, Woodson R, Slichter SJ. Factors influencing moderate to severe reactions to PLT transfusions: experience of the TRAP multicenter clinical trial. Transfusion. 2003;43:1545–52. - PubMed
-
- Roback J, Combs MR, Grossman B, Hillyer C, editors. Technical Manual. 16. Bethesda (MD): American Association of Blood Banks; 2008.
-
- Tobian AA, King KE, Ness PM. Transfusion premedications: a growing practice not based on evidence. Transfusion. 2007;47:1089–96. - PubMed
-
- Vyas GN, Perkins HA, Fudenberg HH. Anaphylactoid transfusion reactions associated with anti-IgA. Lancet. 1968;2:312–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
