Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Dec;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-14.
doi: 10.1111/iwj.12175.

Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management

Affiliations
Review

Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management

Georg Daeschlein. Int Wound J. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Wounds, especially chronic wounds, represent a global problem costing millions of dollars per year in developed countries and are characterised by microbial complications including local or overt infection, delayed healing and spread of multiresistant germs. Therefore, antimicrobial wound management is a major challenge that continues to require new solutions against microbes and their biofilms. As systemic antibiotics can barely penetrate into wound biofilms and topically applied ones can easily lead to sensitisation, antisepsis is the method of choice to treat germs in wounds. This brief review discusses the role of antiseptics in reducing bioburden in chronic wounds. Balancing antimicrobial potency and tolerability of antiseptic procedures is critical in wound therapy. However, antiseptics alone may not be able to achieve wound healing without addressing other factors regarding the patient's general health or the wound's physical environment. Although the precise role of bioburden in chronic wounds remains to be evaluated, planktonic as well as biofilm-bound microbes are indications for antiseptic intervention. Octenidine dihydrochloride and polyhexanide are the most effective, as well as best tolerated, antiseptics in wound management today, and new strategies to reduce bacterial wound burden and support the body's immune response are being developed.

Keywords: Antimicrobial; Antiseptics; Bioburden; Biofilms; Chronic wounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kramer A, Daeschlein G, Kammerlander G, Andriessen A, Aspock C, Bergemann R, Eberlein T, Gerngross H, Gortz G, Heeg P, Junger M, Koch S, Konig B, Laun R, Peter RU, Roth B, Ruef C, Sellmer W, Wewalka G, Eisenbeib W. Konsensusempfehlung zur auswahl von wirkstoffen fur die wundantiseptik. Z Wundheilung 2004;9:110–20.
    1. Hirsch T, Jacobsen F, Rittig A, Goertz O, Niederbichler A, Steinau HU, Seipp HM, Steinstraesser L[. A comparative in vitro study of cell toxicity of clinically used antiseptics]. Hautarzt 2009;60:984–91. - PubMed
    1. Kramer A, Daeschlein G, Kammerlander G, Abdriessen A, Aspock C, Bergemann R[. Consensus recommendation for the choice of antiseptic agents in wound care]. Hyg Med 2004;29:147–57.
    1. Kramer A, Roth B, Muller G, Rudolph P, Klocker N. Influence of the antiseptic agents polyhexanide and octenidine on FL cells and on healing of experimental superficial aseptic wounds in piglets. A double‐blind, randomised, stratified, controlled, parallel‐group study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2004;17:141–6. - PubMed
    1. Muller G, Kramer A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:1281–7. - PubMed

Substances