Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management
- PMID: 24251838
- PMCID: PMC7950476
- DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12175
Antimicrobial and antiseptic strategies in wound management
Abstract
Wounds, especially chronic wounds, represent a global problem costing millions of dollars per year in developed countries and are characterised by microbial complications including local or overt infection, delayed healing and spread of multiresistant germs. Therefore, antimicrobial wound management is a major challenge that continues to require new solutions against microbes and their biofilms. As systemic antibiotics can barely penetrate into wound biofilms and topically applied ones can easily lead to sensitisation, antisepsis is the method of choice to treat germs in wounds. This brief review discusses the role of antiseptics in reducing bioburden in chronic wounds. Balancing antimicrobial potency and tolerability of antiseptic procedures is critical in wound therapy. However, antiseptics alone may not be able to achieve wound healing without addressing other factors regarding the patient's general health or the wound's physical environment. Although the precise role of bioburden in chronic wounds remains to be evaluated, planktonic as well as biofilm-bound microbes are indications for antiseptic intervention. Octenidine dihydrochloride and polyhexanide are the most effective, as well as best tolerated, antiseptics in wound management today, and new strategies to reduce bacterial wound burden and support the body's immune response are being developed.
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Antiseptics; Bioburden; Biofilms; Chronic wounds.
© 2013 The Author. International Wound Journal © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Medicalhelplines.com Inc.
Similar articles
-
[THE ROLE OF ANTISEPTICS AND STRATEGY OF BIOFILM REMOVAL IN CHRONIC WOUND].Acta Med Croatica. 2016 Mar;70(1):33-42. Acta Med Croatica. 2016. PMID: 27220188 Croatian.
-
[Prevention of chronic wound infection].Acta Med Croatica. 2013 Oct;67 Suppl 1:51-8. Acta Med Croatica. 2013. PMID: 24371976 Review. Croatian.
-
Wound cleansing: a key player in the implementation of the TIME paradigm.J Wound Care. 2016 Mar;25(3 Suppl):S7-9. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.Sup3.S7. J Wound Care. 2016. PMID: 26949864
-
The effect of negative pressure wound therapy with antibacterial dressings or antiseptics on an in vitro wound model.J Wound Care. 2017 May 2;26(5):236-242. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.5.236. J Wound Care. 2017. PMID: 28475440
-
Biofilms in chronic wounds and the potential role of negative pressure wound therapy: an integrative review.J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Mar-Apr;40(2):143-9. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e31827e8481. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013. PMID: 23354367 Review.
Cited by
-
Gold nanoclusters-loaded hydrogel formed by dimeric hydrogen bonds crosslinking: A novel strategy for multidrug-resistant bacteria-infected wound healing.Mater Today Bio. 2022 Sep 12;16:100426. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100426. eCollection 2022 Dec. Mater Today Bio. 2022. PMID: 36133795 Free PMC article.
-
Piezoelectric and Triboelectric Nanogenerators for Enhanced Wound Healing.Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Nov 1;8(7):517. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8070517. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37999158 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combined Use of Antimicrobial Peptides with Antiseptics against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: Pros and Cons.Pharmaceutics. 2023 Jan 14;15(1):291. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15010291. Pharmaceutics. 2023. PMID: 36678918 Free PMC article.
-
Chitosan Nanoparticles-Based Cancer Drug Delivery: Application and Challenges.Mar Drugs. 2023 Mar 28;21(4):211. doi: 10.3390/md21040211. Mar Drugs. 2023. PMID: 37103352 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and characterization of a topical gel, containing lavender (Lavandula angustifolia) oil loaded solid lipid nanoparticles.BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04440-2. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024. PMID: 38589838 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kramer A, Daeschlein G, Kammerlander G, Andriessen A, Aspock C, Bergemann R, Eberlein T, Gerngross H, Gortz G, Heeg P, Junger M, Koch S, Konig B, Laun R, Peter RU, Roth B, Ruef C, Sellmer W, Wewalka G, Eisenbeib W. Konsensusempfehlung zur auswahl von wirkstoffen fur die wundantiseptik. Z Wundheilung 2004;9:110–20.
-
- Hirsch T, Jacobsen F, Rittig A, Goertz O, Niederbichler A, Steinau HU, Seipp HM, Steinstraesser L[. A comparative in vitro study of cell toxicity of clinically used antiseptics]. Hautarzt 2009;60:984–91. - PubMed
-
- Kramer A, Daeschlein G, Kammerlander G, Abdriessen A, Aspock C, Bergemann R[. Consensus recommendation for the choice of antiseptic agents in wound care]. Hyg Med 2004;29:147–57.
-
- Kramer A, Roth B, Muller G, Rudolph P, Klocker N. Influence of the antiseptic agents polyhexanide and octenidine on FL cells and on healing of experimental superficial aseptic wounds in piglets. A double‐blind, randomised, stratified, controlled, parallel‐group study. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2004;17:141–6. - PubMed
-
- Muller G, Kramer A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. J Antimicrob Chemother 2008;61:1281–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials