Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan 16;1(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-1-4.

Lung cancer screening: from imaging to biomarker

Affiliations

Lung cancer screening: from imaging to biomarker

Dong Xiang et al. Biomark Res. .

Abstract

Despite several decades of intensive effort to improve the imaging techniques for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, primary lung cancer is still the number one cause of cancer death in the United States and worldwide. The major causes of this high mortality rate are distant metastasis evident at diagnosis and ineffective treatment for locally advanced disease. Indeed, approximately forty percent of newly diagnosed lung cancer patients have distant metastasis. Currently, the only potential curative therapy is surgical resection of early stage lung cancer. Therefore, early detection of lung cancer could potentially increase the chance of cure by surgery and underlines the importance of screening and detection of lung cancer. In the past fifty years, screening of lung cancer by chest X-Ray (CXR), sputum cytology, computed tomography (CT), fluorescence endoscopy and low-dose spiral CT (LDCT) has not improved survival except for the recent report in 2010 by the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), which showed a 20 percent mortality reduction in high risk participants screened with LDCT compared to those screened with CXRs. Furthermore, serum biomarkers for detection of lung cancer using free circulating DNA and RNA, exosomal microRNA, circulating tumor cells and various lung cancer specific antigens have been studied extensively and novel screening methods are being developed with encouraging results. The history of lung cancer screening trials using CXR, sputum cytology and LDCT, as well as results of trials involving various serum biomarkers, are reviewed herein.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Cancer. Fact Sheet No 297. February 2012. Accessed on February 11, 2012. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html.
    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2012;62(1):10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, Feuer EJ, Thun MJ. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2005;55(1):10–30. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.55.1.10. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McWilliams A, Mayo J, MacDonald S, leRiche JC, Palcic B, Szabo E, Lam S. Lung cancer screening: a different paradigm. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168(10):1167–1173. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200301-144OC. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ghosal R, Kloer P, Lewis KE. A review of novel biological tools used in screening for the early detection of lung cancer. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2009;85(1005):358–363. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.076307. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources