Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch
- PMID: 24252455
- DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.11.003
Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch
Abstract
Eight cochlear implant users with near-normal hearing in their non-implanted ear compared pitch percepts for pulsatile electric and acoustic pure-tone stimuli presented to the two ears. Six subjects were implanted with a 31-mm MED-EL FLEX(SOFT) electrode, and two with a 24-mm medium (M) electrode, with insertion angles of the most apical contacts ranging from 565° to 758°. In the first experiment, frequency-place functions were derived from pure-tone matches to 1500-pps unmodulated pulse trains presented to individual electrodes and compared to Greenwood's frequency position map along the organ of Corti. While the overall median downward shift of the obtained frequency-place functions (-0.16 octaves re. Greenwood) and the mean shifts in the basal (<240°; -0.33 octaves) and middle (-0.35 octaves) regions were statistically significant, the shift in the apical region (>480°; 0.26 octaves) was not. Standard deviations of frequency-place functions were approximately half an octave at electrode insertion angles below 480°, increasing to an octave at higher angular locations while individual functions were gradually leveling off. In a second experiment, subjects matched the rates of unmodulated pulse trains presented to individual electrodes in the apical half of the array to low-frequency pure tones between 100 Hz and 450 Hz. The aim was to investigate the influence of electrode place on the salience of temporal pitch cues, for coding strategies that present temporal fine structure information via rate modulations on select apical channels. Most subjects achieved reliable matches to tone frequencies from 100 Hz to 300 Hz only on electrodes at angular insertion depths beyond 360°, while rate-matches to 450-Hz tones were primarily achieved on electrodes at shallower insertion angles. Only for electrodes in the second turn the average slopes of rate-pitch functions did not differ significantly from the pure-tone references, suggesting their use for the encoding of within-channel fine frequency information via rate modulations in temporal fine structure stimulation strategies.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.Ear Hear. 2011 Sep-Oct;32(5):656-62. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821a4800. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21869623
-
Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006 Jun;7(2):110-24. doi: 10.1007/s10162-005-0027-2. Epub 2006 Feb 1. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2006. PMID: 16450213 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of envelope bandwidth on importance functions for cochlear implant simulations.J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):733-44. doi: 10.1121/1.4906260. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015. PMID: 25698008
-
Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants.Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Oct 22. Hear Res. 2015. PMID: 25456089 Review.
-
An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.Hear Res. 2017 Dec;356:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 18. Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 29102129 Review.
Cited by
-
Benefits to Speech Perception in Noise From the Binaural Integration of Electric and Acoustic Signals in Simulated Unilateral Deafness.Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):248-59. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000252. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 27116049 Free PMC article.
-
Comprehensive literature review on the application of the otological surgical planning software OTOPLAN® for cochlear implantation.HNO. 2024 Dec;72(Suppl 2):89-100. doi: 10.1007/s00106-023-01417-4. Epub 2024 Jun 11. HNO. 2024. PMID: 38861031 Free PMC article.
-
Musical Interval Perception With a Cochlear Implant Alone and With a Contralateral Normal Hearing Ear.Trends Hear. 2022 Jan-Dec;26:23312165221142689. doi: 10.1177/23312165221142689. Trends Hear. 2022. PMID: 36464788 Free PMC article.
-
Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):e149-59. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000250. Ear Hear. 2016. PMID: 26583480 Free PMC article.
-
A Level-Adjusted Cochlear Frequency-to-Place Map for Estimating Tonotopic Frequency Mismatch With a Cochlear Implant.Ear Hear. 2025 Jul-Aug 01;46(4):963-975. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001641. Epub 2025 Feb 11. Ear Hear. 2025. PMID: 39930567
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical