Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 24252551
- PMCID: PMC4225503
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-394
Treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascial dehiscence by vacuum assisted closure™ (SAWHI-V.A.C.®-study) versus standard conventional wound therapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: A decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany in 2008 stated that negative pressure wound therapy is not accepted as a standard therapy for full reimbursement by the health insurance companies in Germany. This decision is based on the final report of the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care in 2006, which demonstrated through systematic reviews and meta-analysis of previous study projects, that an insufficient state of evidence regarding the use of negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds exists. Further studies were therefore indicated.
Methods/design: The study is designed as a multinational, multicenter, prospective randomized controlled, adaptive design, clinical superiority trial, with blinded photographic analysis of the primary endpoint. Efficacy and effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for wounds in both medical sectors (in- and outpatient care) will be evaluated. The trial compares the treatment outcome of the application of a technical medical device which is based on the principle of negative pressure wound therapy (intervention group) and standard conventional wound therapy (control group) in the treatment of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery. The aim of the SAWHI-VAC® study is to compare the clinical, safety and economic results of both treatment arms.
Discussion: The study project is designed and conducted with the aim of providing solid evidence regarding the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy. Study results will be provided until the end of 2014 to contribute to the final decision of the Federal Joint Committee Germany regarding the general admission of negative pressure wound therapy as a standard of performance within both medical sectors.
Trial registration: Clinical Trials.gov NCT01528033German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00000648.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial.BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01863-x. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 36503505 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32293657 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Negative pressure wound therapy versus standard wound care in chronic diabetic foot wounds: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2014 Aug 27;15:334. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-334. Trials. 2014. PMID: 25158846 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
EWMA Document: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy.J Wound Care. 2017 Mar 1;26(Sup3):S1-S154. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup3.S1. J Wound Care. 2017. PMID: 28345371 Review.
-
Negative-pressure therapy versus standard wound care: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Nov;128(5):498e-503e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31822b675c. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011. PMID: 22030509 Review.
Cited by
-
Negative pressure wound therapy for treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 4;2015(6):CD011278. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011278.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26042534 Free PMC article.
-
[Postoperative wound infections : Diagnosis, classification and treatment].Chirurg. 2017 May;88(5):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s00104-017-0368-5. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 28127654 Review. German.
-
Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial.BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 12;22(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01863-x. BMC Surg. 2022. PMID: 36503505 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of a standardized negative pressure wound therapy protocol after midline celiotomy to primary skin closure and traditional open wound vacuum-assisted closure management.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018 Jan 8;31(1):25-29. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2017.1400312. eCollection 2018 Jan. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2018. PMID: 29686547 Free PMC article.
-
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Surg. 2020 Jun 1;155(6):469-478. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0414. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32293657 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D, Hay JM, Flamant Y. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4,718 patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:314–324. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.138.3.314. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical