Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;23(5):1434-1441.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2775-6. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Biomechanical characterization of unicortical button fixation: a novel technique for proximal subpectoral biceps tenodesis

Affiliations

Biomechanical characterization of unicortical button fixation: a novel technique for proximal subpectoral biceps tenodesis

Joseph P DeAngelis et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Proximal biceps tenodesis is one method for treating biceps-related pain. Tenodesis protects the length-tension relationship of the biceps muscle, maintains strength, and provides a better cosmetic appearance than tenotomy. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the mechanical properties of a unicortical metal button and an interference screw in proximal biceps tenodesis.

Methods: Six pairs of fresh-frozen shoulders were dissected, leaving the proximal biceps tendon as a free graft. On each pair of shoulders, a biceps tenodesis was performed using an interference screw or a unicortical metal button. The specimens were mounted and a cyclic load (10-60 N) was applied at 1 Hz for 200 cycles, followed by an axial load to failure. The displacement, ultimate load to failure, and mode of failure were recorded.

Results: Displacement in response to cyclic loading was 3.7 ± 2.2 mm for the interference screw and 1.9 ± 1.0 mm for the cortical button (P = 0.03). Load at failure for the interference screw was 191 ± 64 N (stiffness: 24 ± 11 N/mm) and 183 ± 61 N (stiffness: 24 ± 7. N/mm) for the unicortical button (P = n.s. for both cases).

Conclusions: As a novel technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a unicortical button demonstrated significantly less displacement in response to cyclic loading than the interference screw. The ultimate load to failure and stiffness for the two methods were not different. In this way, a unicortical button may provide a reliable alternative method of fixation with a potentially lower risk of post-operative humeral fracture and a construct that permits early mobilization following biceps tenodesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmad CS, ElAttrache NS (2003) Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis. Orthop Clin North Am 34(4):499–506 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arora AS, Singh A, Koonce RC (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a unicortical button versus interference screw for subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Arthroscopy 29(4):638–644 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Basmajian JV, Latif A (1957) Integrated actions and functions of the chief flexors of the elbow: a detailed electromyographic analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 39-A(5):1106–1118 - PubMed
    1. Bassett RW, Browne AO, Morrey BF, An KN (1990) Glenohumeral muscle force and moment mechanics in a position of shoulder instability. J Biomech 23(5):405–415 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG (2005) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(6):1229–1240 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources