Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Oct;18(10):1761-73.
doi: 10.1007/BF02751101.

Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofMicroplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to cotton plant volatiles

Affiliations

Antennal olfactory responsiveness ofMicroplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to cotton plant volatiles

Y Li et al. J Chem Ecol. 1992 Oct.

Abstract

Antennal olfactory responses of the parasitoid,Microplitis croceipes (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), to 29 cotton volatile compounds were measured by electroantennogram (EAG) techniques. No significant sexual differences were found in EAGs of males and females to volatiles emanating from 100-μg stimulus loads of the 29 cotton compounds. Green leaf volatiles (saturated and monounsaturated six-carbon alcohols, aldehydes, and their acetate derivatives), heptanal, and the benzene derivatives, benzaldehyde and acetophenone, elicited the largest EAGs. Monoterpenes elicited moderate EAGs withβ-ocimene being the most effective monoterpene tested. Among the sesquiterpenes tested,β-bisabolol was the most effective stimulus at the 100-μg dose. Dose-response curves constructed from EAGs of females revealed a low threshold for (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, a compound previously shown to be an effective attractant in wind-tunnel bioassays. Comparison of relative volatilities of the various odorants indicated differential selectivity and sensitivity ofM. croceipes antennal receptors to them. The roles of cotton plant volatiles in host habitat location ofM. croceipes are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jul;48(1):50-2 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1984 Apr;10(4):583-600 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1986 Jun;12(6):1247-62 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1985 Jun;11(6):801-8 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1982 Dec;8(12):1473-87 - PubMed