Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jan;7(1):15-24.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000663. Epub 2013 Nov 19.

The effect of an EDTA-based chelation regimen on patients with diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The effect of an EDTA-based chelation regimen on patients with diabetes mellitus and prior myocardial infarction in the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT)

Esteban Escolar et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT) showed clinical benefit of an EDTA-based infusion regimen in patients aged ≥50 years with prior myocardial infarction. Diabetes mellitus before enrollment was a prespecified subgroup.

Methods and results: Patients received 40 infusions of EDTA chelation or placebo. A total of 633 (37%) patients had diabetes mellitus (322 EDTA and 311 placebo). EDTA reduced the primary end point (death, reinfarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for angina; 25% versus 38%; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-0.79; P<0.001) over 5 years. The result remained significant after Bonferroni adjustment for multiple subgroups (99.4% CI, 0.39-0.88; adjusted P=0.002). All-cause mortality was reduced by EDTA chelation (10% versus 16%; hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36-0.88; P=0.011), as was the secondary end point (cardiovascular death, reinfarction, or stroke; 11% versus 17%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91; P=0.017). However, after adjusting for multiple subgroups, those results were no longer significant. The number needed to treat to reduce 1 primary end point over 5 years was 6.5 (95% CI, 4.4-12.7). There was no reduction in events in non-diabetes mellitus (n=1075; P=0.877), resulting in a treatment by diabetes mellitus interaction (P=0.004).

Conclusions: Post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus aged ≥50 demonstrated a marked reduction in cardiovascular events with EDTA chelation. These findings support efforts to replicate these findings and define the mechanisms of benefit. However, they do not constitute sufficient evidence to indicate the routine use of chelation therapy for all post-myocardial infarction patients with diabetes mellitus.

Clinical trial registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00044213.

Keywords: diabetes mellitus; myocardial infarction; secondary prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort Diagram
* Screened patients not randomized due to inclusion/exclusion criteria, unwillingness to participate, or other reasons ** Among patients who withdrew from the study or were lost to follow-up, 18 met the primary endpoint prior to withdrawal or becoming lost. Among the patients who had not experienced an event prior to withdrawal or becoming lost, 6 were found through search of death registries to have died. All of these events were included in the primary endpoint analysis
Figure 2a
Figure 2a
Primary endpoint in diabetic patients.
Figure 2b
Figure 2b
Primary endpoint in non-diabetic patients.
Figure 3a
Figure 3a
Secondary endpoint in diabetic patients.
Figure 3b
Figure 3b
Secondary endpoint in non-diabetic patients.
Figure 4a
Figure 4a
Myocardial Infarction in diabetic patients by infusion group.
Figure 4b
Figure 4b
Mortality in diabetic patients by infusion group.

Comment in

References

    1. Clarke NE, Clarke CN, Mosher RE. The in vivo dissolution of metastatic calcium; an approach to atherosclerosis. Am J Med Sci. 1955;229:142–149. - PubMed
    1. Clarke CN, Clarke NE, Mosher RE. Treatment of angina pectoris with disodium ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid. Am J Med Sci. 1956;232:654–666. - PubMed
    1. Grier MT, Meyers DG. So much writing, so little science: a review of 37 years of literature on edetate sodium chelation therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 1993;27:1504–9. - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Health. EDTA Chelation Therapy for Coronary Artery Disease, RFA-AT-01004. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-AT-01-004.html.
    1. Lamas GA, Goertz C, Boineau R, Mark DB, Rozema T, Nahin RL, Lindblad L, Lewis EF, Drisko J, Lee KL. Effect of disodium EDTA chelation regimen on cardiovascular events in patients with previous myocardial infarction: the TACT randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309:1241–50. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data