Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2013 Aug 31:13:134.
doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-13-134.

Improvement of long-term outcomes in pancreatic cancer and its associated factors within the gemcitabine era: a collaborative retrospective multicenter clinical review of 1,082 patients

Observational Study

Improvement of long-term outcomes in pancreatic cancer and its associated factors within the gemcitabine era: a collaborative retrospective multicenter clinical review of 1,082 patients

Taira Kuroda et al. BMC Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Background: Although the outcomes of pancreatic cancer have been improved by gemcitabine, the changes in its characteristics and long-term outcomes within the gemcitabine era remain unclear. This study was conducted to identify clinical characteristics of pancreatic cancer patients within the gemcitabine era.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed at 10 centers for 1,248 consecutive patients who were ever considered to have a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer between 2001 and 2010. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis date, clinical stage, treatment, and outcome 1,082 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed further. The chi-square test, Student's t-test, and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for statistical analysis. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Differences in survival analyses were determined using the log-rank test.

Results: The distribution of clinical stages was: I, 2.2% II, 3.4% III, 13% IVa, 27% and IVb, 55%. Chemotherapy alone was administered to 42% of patients and 17% underwent resection. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 39%, 13%, and 6.9%, respectively. The median survival time was 257 days, but differed considerably among treatments and clinical stages. Demographics, distribution of clinical stage, and cause of death did not differ between groups A (2001-2005, n=406) and B (2006-2010, n=676). However, group B included more patients who underwent chemotherapy (P<0.0001) and fewer treated with best supportive care (P=0.0004), mirroring improvements in this group's long-term outcomes (P=0.0063). Finally, factors associated with long-term outcomes derived from multivariate analysis were clinical stage (P<0.0001), location of the tumor (P=0.0294) and treatments (surgery, chemotherapy) (<0.0001).

Conclusions: Long-term outcomes in pancreatic cancer has improved even within the gemcitabine era, suggesting the importance of offering chemotherapy to patients previously only considered for best supportive care. Most patients are still diagnosed at an advanced stage, making clinical strategy development for diagnosing pancreatic cancer at earlier stages essential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in the clinical stages and treatments in pancreatic cancer. a. Changes in the clinical stages of patients with pancreatic cancer between 2001 and 2010 (n = 1,082). b. Changes in treatments for patients with pancreatic cancer between 2001 and 2010 (n = 1,082). OP, operation; CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiation therapy; BSC, best supportive care.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of survival curves in pancreatic cancer. a. Comparison of survival curves among clinical stages in patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 1,082). MST, median survival time. b. Comparison of survival curves among different treatments in patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 1,082). MST, median survival time; OP, operation; CT, chemotherapy; BSC, best supportive care.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of survival curves in pancreatic cancer. a. Comparison of survival curves between Group A (2001–2005) and Group B (2006–2010) in patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 1,082). MST, median survival time. b. Comparison of survival curves between Group A (2001–2005) and Group B (2006–2010) in patients with pancreatic cancer who chose chemotherapy or best supportive care (n = 895). MST, median survival time. c. Comparison of survival curves between patients with pancreatic cancer who chose chemotherapy and best supportive care in Group A (2001–2005) (n = 342). MST, median survival time. d. Comparison of survival curves between patients with pancreatic cancer who chose chemotherapy and best supportive care in Group B (2006–2010) (n = 553). MST, median survival time. e. Comparison of survival curves between Group A (2001–2005) and Group B (2006–2010) in patients who had pancreatic cancer and underwent surgical resection (n = 187). MST, median survival time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Raimondi S, Maisonneuve P, Lowenfels AB. Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: an overview. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:699–708. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.177. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kelsen DP, Portenoy R, Thaler H, Tao Y, Brennan M. Pain as a predictor of outcome in patients with operable pancreatic carcinoma. Surgery. 1997;122:53–59. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6060(97)90264-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tanaka M. Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreatic Cancer Registry Report 2007 (in Japanese with English Abstract) Suizou. 2007;22:e1–e94.
    1. Egawa S, Toma H, Ohigashi H, Okusaka T, Nakao A, Hatori T, Maguchi H, Yanagisawa A, Tanaka M. Japan Pancreatic Cancer Registry; 30th Year Anniversary. Japan Pancreas Society. Pancreas. 2012;41:985–992. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318258055c. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Isaji S, Kawarada Y. Evaluation of classification of pancreatic cancer by the Japan Pancreas Society and Union Internationale Contre le Cancer and proposal for a new international classification (in Japanese with English Abstract) Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2000;101:205–211. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms