Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;9(4):224-31.
doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e3182913837.

Patients do not always complain when they are dissatisfied: implications for service quality and patient safety

Affiliations

Patients do not always complain when they are dissatisfied: implications for service quality and patient safety

Matylda Howard et al. J Patient Saf. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the actions taken by patients who had been admitted to an acute care Queensland hospital and experienced dissatisfaction with service delivery. It is proposed that before complaints can be used as part of a strategy to inform health service improvement and ultimately ensure patient safety, an understanding of the effectiveness of the complaints handling process from the patient's perspective must be gained.

Methods: In-depth qualitative interviews using a phenomenological exploration were undertaken. The theoretical framework supporting the thematic analysis of the interview data was drawn from Lazarus's cognitive emotive model of coping. Analysis of the research data, aided by Leximancer software, revealed a series of relational themes that supported the interpretative data analysis process undertaken.

Findings: In 16 interviews, the study outcomes identified that 15 of the participants did not voice their complaint at the time of the event, but after the event, they stated they wished that they had reacted differently and complained at the actual point in time that they were dissatisfied. The themes that emerged that reflected potential lost opportunities included issues with ineffective communication, being treated with disrespect, inconsistent standards of care, perceptions of negligence, and lack of information about how to make a complaint.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that health-care professionals should take a more active role in identifying and responding to patients who are experiencing dissatisfaction but are not actively complaining. This level of vigilance and responsiveness will ensure opportunities to improve health service delivery, and patient safety are not lost.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors disclose no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
How to understand the cognitive appraisal process (adapted from,:) A, We think about the situation/event and how it will affect us. B, We determine how we will cope or respond to the situation or the event. C, The emotion or coping strategy is expressed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brouwer GE. Good practice guide to complaint handling for Victorian public sector agencies. 2007;57.
    1. Hsieh SY, Thomas D, Rotem A. The organisational response to patient complaints: a case study in Taiwan. Int J Health Care QA. 2005;18:308–320. - PubMed
    1. Nisselle P Managing medical indemnity: must we choose between quality assurance and risk management? Med J Aust. 2004;181:64–65. - PubMed
    1. Romios P, Newby L, Wohlers M, et al. Turning wrongs into rights: learning from consumer reported incidents: An annotated literature review. Department of Health and Ageing, Commonwealth of Australia; 2003.
    1. Wilson L, Fulton M. Risk management: how doctors, hospitals and MDOs can limit the costs of malpractice litigation. Med J Aust. 2000;172:77–80. - PubMed