Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Sep;17(9):1783-99.
doi: 10.1007/BF00993728.

White alder and Douglas-fir foliage quality and interegg-mass influences on larval development of gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar

Affiliations

White alder and Douglas-fir foliage quality and interegg-mass influences on larval development of gypsy moth,Lymantria dispar

G Joseph et al. J Chem Ecol. 1991 Sep.

Abstract

Individual families of gypsy moth collected from a single population exhibited different degrees of fitness when fed diets of white alder, a suitable broadleaf host, and Douglas-fir, an unsuitable conifer host. Members of families on diets of Douglas-fir had significantly lower survival, longer larval periods, lower pupal weights, and shorter pupal periods than members of the same families fed alder. Foliar nutritional quality, including nitrogen level and allelochemical composition (terpenes and phenols), was considered the key factor responsible for these differences. Growth parameters differed significantly for families within diet treatments, indicating that the genetic resources of a family did affect performance somewhat. The influence of a family's genetic resources on larval survival was most notable when larvae were under the greatest nutritional stress.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Chem Ecol. 1990 May;16(5):1731-8 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1982 Dec;8(12):1429-36 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1987 Apr;72(1):137-147 - PubMed
    1. J Chem Ecol. 1990 May;16(5):1719-30 - PubMed
    1. Oecologia. 1986 Dec;71(1):133-137 - PubMed