Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;22(6):1249-59.
doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2716-4. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

Cartilage extra-cellular matrix biomembrane for the enhancement of microfractured defects

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cartilage extra-cellular matrix biomembrane for the enhancement of microfractured defects

Jun Young Chung et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether the biomembrane made of cartilage extracellular matrix, designed to provide cartilage-like favourable environments as well as to prevent against washout of blood clot after microfracture, would enhance cartilage repair compared with the conventional microfracture technique.

Methods: A prospective trial was designed to compare the biomembrane cover after microfracture with conventional microfracture among patients with grade III-IV symptomatic cartilage defect in the knee joint. Patients aged 18-60 years were assigned to either the microfracture/biomembrane (n = 45) or microfracture groups (n = 19). Among them, 24 knees in the microfracture/biomembrane and 12 knees in the microfracture were followed up for 2 years. Cartilage repair was assessed with magnetic resonance imagings taken 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively, and the clinical outcomes were also recorded.

Results: Compared with conventional microfracture, microfracture/biomembrane resulted in greater degree of cartilage repair (p = 0.043). In the intra-group analysis, while microfracture showed moderate to good degree of cartilage repair in nearly 50 % of the patients (47 % at 6 months to 50% at 2 years; n.s.), microfracture/biomembrane maintained an equivalent degree of repair up to 2 years (88% at 6 months to 75% at 2 years; n.s.). The clinical outcome at 2 years also showed improved knee score and satisfaction and decreased pain in each group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Compared with conventional microfracture, biomembrane cover after microfracture yielded superior outcome in terms of the degree of cartilage repair during 2 years of follow-up. This implies that initial protection of blood clot and immature repair tissue at the microfractured defect is important for the promotion of enhanced cartilage repair, which may be obtained by the application of a biomembrane.

Level of evidence: Prospective comparative study, Level II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jan;57(1):16-23 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 May;(422):214-23 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2005 Sep;21(9):1066-75 - PubMed
    1. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2006 Mar;63(5):616-26 - PubMed
    1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Apr;75(4):532-53 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources