Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan 9;123(2):271-80.
doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-05-501247. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Exploratory studies of extended storage of apheresis platelets in a platelet additive solution (PAS)

Affiliations

Exploratory studies of extended storage of apheresis platelets in a platelet additive solution (PAS)

Sherrill J Slichter et al. Blood. .

Abstract

To evaluate the poststorage viability of apheresis platelets stored for up to 18 days in 80% platelet additive solution (PAS)/20% plasma, 117 healthy subjects donated platelets using the Haemonetics MCS+, COBE Spectra (Spectra), or Trima Accel (Trima) systems. Control platelets from the same subjects were compared with their stored test PAS platelets by radiolabeling their stored and control platelets with either (51)chromium or (111)indium. Trima platelets met Food and Drug Administration poststorage platelet viability criteria for only 7 days vs almost 13 days for Haemonetics platelets; ie, platelet recoveries after these storage times averaged 44 ± 3% vs 49 ± 3% and survivals were 5.4 ± 0.3 vs 4.6 ± 0.3 days, respectively. The differences in storage duration are likely related to both the collection system and the storage bag. The Spectra and Trima platelets were hyperconcentrated during collection, and PAS was added, whereas the Haemonetics platelets were elutriated with PAS, which may have resulted in less collection injury. When Spectra and Trima platelets were stored in Haemonetics' bags, poststorage viability was significantly improved. Platelet viability is better maintained in vitro than in vivo, allowing substantial increases in platelet storage times. However, implementation will require resolution of potential bacterial overgrowth during storage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Recoveries and survivals of stored apheresis platelets. (A) Recoveries of Haemonetics, Spectra, and Trima platelets stored for 1 to 18 days. (B) Survivals of Haemonetics, Spectra, and Trima platelets stored for 1 to 18 days. ●, data for Haemonetics stored platelets in CLX bags; ▲, for Spectra stored platelets; ▪, for Trima stored platelets. All data are given for platelets stored in each system’s own bags. Data are given as average ±1 standard error.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stored platelet recoveries and survivals as a percentage of control platelets (fresh or 1-day plasma-stored platelets). (A) Stored platelet recoveries compared with control platelets. (B) Stored platelet survivals compared with control platelets. Shown are the 2-sided LCLs for the mean difference between the stored platelets and the proportion of the fresh or 1-day plasma platelets (control platelets) specified by the FDA criteria. The LCLs are a function of both the means and standard deviations of these differences. These limits have been transformed to a percent of control scale. The horizontal, dashed lines show the critical values specified by FDA’s poststorage platelet viability criteria; ie, platelet recoveries should be ≥66% and survivals ≥58% of each subject’s paired control platelets. ●, data for Haemonetics MCS+ platelets in CLX bags; ○, in CPP bags; ▪, for Trima platelets in Terumo BCT bags; and □, in Haemonetics CLX bags.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relationship between poststorage pH and storage volume, platelet concentration, total platelet count, and poststorage pCO2, pO2, and glucose for Haemonetics, Spectra, or Trima collected platelets. (A) Poststorage pH vs storage volume. (B) Poststorage pH vs platelet concentration. (C) Poststorage pH vs total platelet count. (D) Poststorage pH vs poststorage pCO2. (E) Poststorage pH vs poststorage pO2. (F) Poststorage pH vs poststorage glucose concentration. ●, data for Haemonetics platelets in CLX bag; ○, in CPP bags; ▪, for Trima platelets in Terumo BCT bags; □, in Haemonetics CLX bags; ▲, for Spectra platelets in Terumo BCT bags; and △, in Haemonetics CLX bags.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationship between post-transfusion in vivo vs in vitro data. (A) Poststorage platelet recoveries vs in vitro measurements. (B) Poststorage platelet survivals vs in vitro measurements. ●, data for Haemonetics platelets in CLX bag; ○, in CPP bags; ▪, for Trima platelets in Terumo BCT bags; □, in Haemonetics CLX bags; ▲, for Spectra platelets in Terumo BCT bags; and △, in Haemonetics CLX bags. The regression lines for the data are shown as the hatched lines, and the r2 values are given on the figures.

References

    1. Rock G, Swenson SD, Adams GA. Platelet storage in a plasma-free medium. Transfusion. 1985;25(6):551–556. - PubMed
    1. Holme S, Heaton WA, Courtright M. Improved in vivo and in vitro viability of platelet concentrates stored for seven days in a platelet additive solution. Br J Haematol. 1987;66(2):233–238. - PubMed
    1. van der Meer PF, Pietersz RN, Tiekstra MJ, Huijgens PC, Dekker WJ, Reesink HW. WBC-reduced platelet concentrates from pooled buffy coats in additive solution: an evaluation of in vitro and in vivo measures. Transfusion. 2001;41(7):917–922. - PubMed
    1. Vamvakas EC, Blajchman MA. Transfusion-related mortality: the ongoing risks of allogeneic blood transfusion and the available strategies for their prevention. Blood. 2009;113(15):3406–3417. - PubMed
    1. Heddle NM, Klama L, Singer J, et al. The role of the plasma from platelet concentrates in transfusion reactions. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(10):625–628. - PubMed

Publication types