Use of sedation and neuromuscular blockers in critically ill adults receiving high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
- PMID: 24259726
- DOI: 10.1177/1060028013503121
Use of sedation and neuromuscular blockers in critically ill adults receiving high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
Abstract
Background: Nearly all patients receive sedation and neuromuscular blockers (NMBs) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV).
Objective: To describe analgo-sedation and NMB use prior to and during HFOV in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Methods: Retrospective single-center study of 131 consecutive adults whose care was managed with HFOV from 2002 to 2011.
Results: During the first 4 days of HFOV, 89% and 95% of patients received sedation and opioids, respectively. Upon HFOV initiation, 119 (90.8%) patients received fentanyl doses higher than 200 µg/h; of these, 48 also received more than 20 mg/h of midazolam. Analgo-sedation doses increased significantly over time such that doses were double by day 3. Factors independently associated with fentanyl doses higher than 200 µg/h were NMB ever used (OR 4.43; 95% CI 1.26-15.65, p = 0.02), pH less than 7.15 (OR 2.08; 95% CI 1.22-3.5, p = 0.007), worsening partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen (OR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00-1.10, p = 0.04), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.97, p = 0.009). Deep sedation was commonly administered when NMBs were not being used, with 99.2% of sedation-agitation scores of 1 or 2. Eighty-six patients (65.6%) received NMBs and use was greatest on day 1 (59.5%). Train-of-Four was measured every hour for 53.4% of patients; 29.2% of the measurements were 0 of 4. NMB use declined over the 10-year study period.
Conclusions: High analgo-sedation doses were associated with APACHE II scores, worsening gas exchange, and NMB use. Two thirds of patients received NMBs; use was highest on day 1 and subsequently declined. The percentage of patients who received NMB during HFOV in our study was lower than that previously reported. Future research should evaluate patient outcomes with and without use of NMBs, as well as the potential to manage patients with less sedation.
Keywords: high frequency oscillatory ventilation; intensive care unit; neuromuscular blockers; sedation.
Similar articles
-
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults: the Toronto experience.Chest. 2004 Aug;126(2):518-27. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.2.518. Chest. 2004. PMID: 15302739
-
High frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in adult respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN24242669].Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R430-9. doi: 10.1186/cc3737. Epub 2005 Jun 21. Crit Care. 2005. PMID: 16137357 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Respiratory controversies in the critical care setting. Does high-frequency ventilation offer benefits over conventional ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome?Respir Care. 2007 May;52(5):595-605; discussion 606-8. Respir Care. 2007. PMID: 17484791
-
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Sustained Neuromuscular Blockade in the Adult Critically Ill Patient.Crit Care Med. 2016 Nov;44(11):2079-2103. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002027. Crit Care Med. 2016. PMID: 27755068 Review.
-
When should sedation or neuromuscular blockade be used during mechanical ventilation?Respir Care. 2011 Feb;56(2):168-76; discussion 176-80. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01095. Respir Care. 2011. PMID: 21333177 Review.
Cited by
-
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: A narrative review.Can J Respir Ther. 2019 May 2;55:40-46. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2019-004. eCollection 2019. Can J Respir Ther. 2019. PMID: 31297448 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Myorelaxants in ARDS patients.Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;46(12):2357-2372. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06297-8. Epub 2020 Nov 7. Intensive Care Med. 2020. PMID: 33159530 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Physiological Basis of High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation and Current Evidence in Adults and Children: A Narrative Review.Front Physiol. 2022 Apr 26;13:813478. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.813478. eCollection 2022. Front Physiol. 2022. PMID: 35557962 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources