Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;25(7):769-74.
doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.769. Epub 2013 Aug 20.

Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: psychometric properties of the thai version

Affiliations

Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: psychometric properties of the thai version

Jatuporn Suttiwong et al. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

[Purpose] The present study aimed to cross-culturally translate and evaluate the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI). [Subjects] One hundred and thirty-nine persons with SCI who lived in the community were recruited for this study. [Methods] The IPA was translated following the guideline for cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. The reliability and validity was examined in 139 persons with SCI. For the test-retest reliability, 30 participants completed the Thai version of the IPA twice with a 2-week interval. [Results] The translated questionnaire and its items had moderate to good reliability, with the ICC(3,1) ranging from 0.76 to 0.93. The internal consistency for all domains was high, with Cronbach's alpha ranging from 0.86 to 0.90. The convergent validity, discriminant validity, and construct validity were supported. [Conclusion] The Thai version of the IPA is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the level of community participation in Thai persons with spinal cord injury.

Keywords: Assessment; Community participation; Spinal cord injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schönherr MC, Groothoff JW, Mulder GA, et al. : Participation and satisfaction after spinal cord injury: results of vocational and leisure outcome study. Spinal Cord, 2005, 43: 241–248 - PubMed
    1. Tonack M, Hitzig SL, Craven BC, et al. : Predicting life satisfaction after spinal cord injury in Canadian sample. Spinal Cord, 2008, 46: 380–385 - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability. Geneva2001
    1. World Health Organization: The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps. Geneva1980 - PubMed
    1. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence. Volume 2: Outcome measures (version 1.0) [database on the Internet]2006. Available from: www.icord.org/scire

LinkOut - more resources