Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Sep;25(9):1083-6.
doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1083. Epub 2013 Oct 20.

Response Inhibition Induced in the Stop-signal Task by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Pre-supplementary Motor Area and Primary Sensoriomotor Cortex

Affiliations

Response Inhibition Induced in the Stop-signal Task by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Pre-supplementary Motor Area and Primary Sensoriomotor Cortex

Yong Hyun Kwon et al. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

[Purpose] This study examined whether transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of both the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and primary sensoriomotor cortex (M1) alters the response time in response inhibition using the stop-signal task (SST). [Methods] Forty healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. The subjects were randomly tested under the three: the pre-SMA tDCS, M1 tDCS, and Sham tDCS conditions. All subjects performed a SST in two consecutive phases: without or after the delivery of anodal tDCS over one of the target sites (pre-SMA or the M1) and under the Sham tDCS condition. [Results] Our findings demonstrated significant reductions in the stop processing times after the anodal tDCS over pre-SMA, and change response times were significantly greater under the pre-SMA tDCS condition compared to both the M1 tDCS condition and the Sham tDCS condition. There was no significant major effect after delivery of the tDCS for the go processing times observed among the three conditions. [Conclusion] Anodal tDCS of the pre-SMA or M1 during performance of the SST resulted in enhancement of the volitional stop movement in inhibitory control. Our results suggest that when concurrently applied with the SST, tDCS might be a useful adjuvant therapeutic modality for modulation of the response inhibition and its related dynamic behavioral changes between motor execution and suppression.

Keywords: Response inhibition; Stop signal task; Transcranial direct current stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Verbruggen F, Logan GD: Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 2009, 35: 1381–1388 - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Poldrack RA: Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci, 2006, 26: 2424–2433 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bekker EM, Overtoom CC, Kooij JJ, et al. : Disentangling deficits in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2005, 62: 1129–1136 - PubMed
    1. Aron AR, Durston S, Eagle DM, et al. : Converging evidence for a fronto-basal-ganglia network for inhibitory control of action and cognition. J Neurosci, 2007, 27: 11860–11864 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Badry R, Mima T, Aso T, et al. : Suppression of human cortico-motoneuronal excitability during the Stop-signal task. Clin Neurophysiol, 2009, 120: 1717–1723 - PubMed