Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e80111.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080111. eCollection 2013.

Coordination between p21 and DDB2 in the cellular response to UV radiation

Affiliations

Coordination between p21 and DDB2 in the cellular response to UV radiation

Hao Li et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The tumor suppressor p53 guides the cellular response to DNA damage mainly by regulating expression of target genes. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21, which is induced by p53, can both arrest the cell cycle and inhibit apoptosis. Interestingly, p53-inducible DDB2 (damaged-DNA binding protein 2) promotes apoptosis by mediating p21 degradation after ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage. Here, we developed an integrated model of the p53 network to explore how the UV-irradiated cell makes a decision between survival and death and how the activities of p21 and DDB2 are modulated. By numerical simulations, we found that p53 is activated progressively and the promoter selectivity of p53 depends on its concentration. For minor DNA damage, p53 settles at an intermediate level. p21 is induced by p53 to arrest the cell cycle via inhibiting E2F1 activity, allowing for DNA repair. The proapoptotic genes are expressed at low levels. For severe DNA damage, p53 undergoes a two-phase behavior and accumulates to high levels in the second phase. Consequently, those proapoptotic proteins accumulate remarkably. Bax activates the release of cytochrome c, while DDB2 promotes the degradation of p21, which leads to activation of E2F1 and induction of Apaf-1. Finally, the caspase cascade is activated to trigger apoptosis. We revealed that the downregulation of p21 is necessary for apoptosis induction and PTEN promotes apoptosis by amplifying p53 activation. This work demonstrates that how the dynamics of the p53 network can be finely regulated through feed-forward and feedback loops within the network and emphasizes the importance of p21 regulation in the DNA damage response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the model for the p53 network responding to UV-induced DNA damage.
The model is composed of four modules. Two p53-centered feedback loops are considered: the p53-Mdm2 negative feedback loop and the p53-PTEN-Akt-Mdm2 positive feedback loop. Cell cycle arrest is induced through p21-dependent inhibition of E2F1, while apoptosis is triggered via the caspase cascade activated by Bax and Apaf-1. Dashed lines denote gene expression induced by p53 and E2F1. Solid arrowed lines represent transitions between proteins, promotion or inhibition of which is denoted by circle-headed and bar-headed lines, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Dynamics of key components of the p53 network.
Temporal evolution of the levels of DNA damage, ATRp, p53p, p21tot, Bax, and Casp3 (from top to bottom) at formula image (A) or 20 (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Switching behavior of ATR as a sensor of DNA damage.
(A) Bifurcation diagram of [ATRp] vs. formula image (without DNA repair). (B) Time courses of [ATRp] at formula image (black), 10 (red), or 20 (blue).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Role of PTEN in the two-phase dynamics of [p53p].
(A) Time courses of [p53p] at formula image (black), 10 (red), or 20 (blue). (B) Maximum of [p53p] throughout the cellular response vs. formula image. (C) Bifurcation diagram of [p53p] vs. the p53-inducible production rate of PTEN, formula image, at fixed formula image. (D) Time courses of [p53p] with formula image (black) or 0.05 (red).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptosis by p21.
(A) Time courses of [p21tot] (black), [Rbp] (red), and [E2F1] (blue) at formula image. (B) Time courses of [p21tot] (black), [E2F1] (green), [Apaf-1] (red), and [Casp9] (blue) at formula image. (C) Bifurcation diagram of [E2F1] vs. the p53-inducible production rate of p21, formula image. (D) Time courses of [p21tot] (black), [E2F1] (blue), [CytoC] (red), and [Casp9] (green) with formula image and formula image.
Figure 6
Figure 6. DDB2 promotes apoptosis via mediating the degradation of p21.
(A) Time courses of [DDB2] at formula image 5 (black) or 20 (red). (B) Bifurcation diagram of [p21tot] vs. the p53-inducible production rate of DDB2, formula image. (C) Time courses of [p21tot] (black), [E2F1] (green), [Bax] (red), and [Casp9] (blue) with formula image at formula image. (D) Time courses of [Casp9] with the normal parameter setting (i.e., formula image and formula image) (black), formula image and formula image (blue), or formula image and formula image (red).

References

    1. Meek DW (2009) Tumour suppression by p53: a role for the DNA damage response? Nat Rev Cancer 9: 714–723. - PubMed
    1. Bieging KT, Attardi LD (2012) Deconstructing p53 transcriptional networks in tumor suppression. Trends Cell Biol 22: 97–106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray-Zmijewski F, Slee EA, Lu X (2008) A complex barcode underlies the heterogeneous response of p53 to stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 702–712. - PubMed
    1. Speidel D (2009) Transcription-independent p53 apoptosis: an alternative route to death. Trends Cell Biol 20: 14–24. - PubMed
    1. Lahav G, Rosenfeld N, Sigal A, Geva-Zatorsky N, Levine AJ, et al. (2004) Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells. Nat Genet 36: 147–150. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms