Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;1(1):10.2174/2213235X11301010028.
doi: 10.2174/2213235X11301010028.

Databases and Software for NMR-Based Metabolomics

Affiliations

Databases and Software for NMR-Based Metabolomics

James J Ellinger et al. Curr Metabolomics. 2013.

Abstract

New software and increasingly sophisticated NMR metabolite spectral databases are advancing the unique abilities of NMR spectroscopy to identify and quantify small molecules in solution for studies of metabolite biomarkers and metabolic flux. Public and commercial databases now contain experimental 1D 1H, 13C and 2D 1H-13C spectra and extracted spectral parameters for over a thousand compounds and theoretical data for thousands more. Public databases containing experimental NMR data from complex metabolic studies are emerging. These databases are providing information vital for the construction and testing of new computational algorithms for NMR-based chemometric and quantitative metabolomics studies. In this review we focus on database and software tools that support a quantitative NMR approach to the analysis of 1D and 2D NMR spectra of complex biological mixtures.

Keywords: Chemometrics; databases; nuclear magnetic resonance; quantitative metabolomics; software.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors confirm that this article content has no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Overview of NMR metabolomics analysis workflow: The figure integrates the workflow involved in NMR metabolomics data analysis by both a chemometrics and “identify and quantify” approach. In a typical chemometrics approach, the workflow proceeds from data collection, processing, binning, and then multivariate analysis to identify spectral patterns of change. Metabolite identification, if performed at all, will occur after multivariate analysis. In an “identify and quantify” approach, the step of spectral identification occurs much earlier in the workflow, either after spectral processing or region of interest (ROI) segmentation. Model fitting is a technique that can be used in either workflow to create amplitudes to be used in the feature matrix. All of the features in the feature matrix (see Table 6) are actually derived values from the metabolite concentration.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
L-alanine as an example of an interactive 1H-NMR session in the MQMCD. The doublet at 1.47 ppm was selected in the NMR spectrum, and the corresponding methyl protons were highlighted in the Jmol structure (yellow atoms).
Fig. (3)
Fig. (3)
Spectrum from an E. coli extract (top) demonstrating use of regions of interest (ROIs) with rNMR [25]. Array of ROIs (red boxes) for multiple metabolites from a series of E. coli extracts (bottom) from rNMR.
Fig. (4)
Fig. (4)
Fast maximum likelihood reconstruction (FMLR) of a 2D 1H-13C spectrum of liver extract performed by the Newton software package [19]. (Left) contour plot of a region of the 1H-13C HSQC spectrum. (Middle) The FMLR reconstruction of the region. (Right) The corresponding residual. Annotations on the spectrum denote the centers of signals that were identified by FMLR. Signals from glucose (A) are much higher than those nearby from proline (B), and fructose (C,D,E). The volume of the observable residual in region A is less than 3% of the volume of the peaks. The amplitudes of the signals in the reconstruction are proportional to the concentration of the underlying species.
Fig. (5)
Fig. (5)
Overview of functionality and modules in the MetaboAnalyst 2.0 Package. Figure reproduced from [27].

References

    1. Weljie AM, Newton J, Mercier P, Carlson E, Slupsky CM. Targeted profiling: quantitative analysis of 1H NMR metabolomics data. Anal Chem. 2006;78(13):4430–4442. - PubMed
    1. Psychogios N, Hau DD, Peng J, Guo AC, Mandal R, Bouatra S, Sinelnikov I, Krishnamurthy R, Eisner R, Gautam B, Young N, Xia J, Knox C, Dong E, Huang P, Hollander Z, Pedersen TL, Smith SR, Bamforth F, Greiner R, McManus B, Newman JW, Goodfriend T, Wishart DS. The Human Serum Metabolome. Plos One. 2011;6(2):e16957–e16957. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wishart DS, Lewis MJ, Morrissey JA, Flegel MD, Jeroncic K, Xiong Y, Cheng D, Eisner R, Gautam B, Tzur D, Sawhney S, Bamforth F, Greiner R, Li L. The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome. Journal of Chromatography B. 2008;871(2):164–173. - PubMed
    1. Wishart DS. Quantitative metabolomics using NMR. Trends Anal Chem. 2008;27(3):228–237.
    1. Markley JL, Anderson ME, Cui Q, Eghbalnia HR, Lewis IA, Hegeman AD, Li J, Schulte CF, Sussman MR, Westler WM, Ulrich EL, Zolnai Z. New bioinformatics resources for metabolomics. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2007:157–168. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources