Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Sep;76(3):306-10.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for critically ill patients in a general intensive care unit

Affiliations
  • PMID: 24261024
Free article
Comparative Study

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for critically ill patients in a general intensive care unit

Fausto Ferraro et al. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2013 Sep.
Free article

Abstract

Background and aim: percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is an effective way of providing enteral feeding to patients with functionally normal gastrointestinal tract who cannot meet their nutritional needs because of inadequate oral intake. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical outcome of critically ill patients with high assistance level undergoing PEG in a general ICU over a 12 year period.

Patients and methods: we studied a cohort of 82 patients who underwent PEG over a 12-year period between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2010. Patients were followed-up for 1 year after PEG placement.

Results: There were no complications related either to the procedure or to the management of PEG, even in house nursing.In one patient, PEG with a collapsible bumper was successfully removed because the patient fully recovered from his neurological problem. Catheter substitution was necessary in three patients during the first year, because of stoma inflammation due to enteric reflux between the stoma and the catheter. One year after PEG, 66 patients were still alive while 16 patients died from the underlying disease during hospitalization. None of the patients with PEG had aspiration pneumonia.

Conclusions: PEG, in expert hands, is a safe and effective procedure for enteral nutrition. Moreover, catheters should be chosen in relation to the duration of enteral feeding and as to whether the patient is likely to recover from his underlying disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources